DRY NEEDLING VERSUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN TREATMENT OF LATENT TRIGGER POINT UPPER TRAPEZIUS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YEGANEH LARI A.; OKHOVATIAN F.; NAIMI S.S.; AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Modern Rehabilitation Year:2016 | Volume:10 | Issue:1 Page(s): 12-20

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,044

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DRY NEEDLING VERSUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN TREATMENT OF LATENT TRIGGER POINT UPPER TRAPEZIUS

Author(s)

YEGANEH LARI A. | OKHOVATIAN F. | NAIMI S.S. | AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DRY NEEDLINGQ1

MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUEQ1

TRIGGER POINTSQ1

Abstract

Background and Aim: The main cause of Myofascial pain syndrome is trigger point. The purpose of this study was to compare MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE (MET) with DRY NEEDLING (DN) on latent trigger point of upper trapezius.Materials and Methods: Fourty females, with diagnosis of latent trigger point of upper trapezius after adopting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were equally and randomly allocated into either the MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE or DRY NEEDLING groups. Each patient received one treatment to the upper trapezius muscle. Outcome measures (visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and range of active contra lateralflexion (CLF) measured before and 48 hours after treatment.Results: Two techniques which used in this study were effective for treating latent trigger point of upper trapezius (P<0.001) but no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the above variables (p>0.05).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE was as effective as DRY NEEDLING in improvement of VAS, PPT and ROM in subjects with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. But since MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE is safe and non-invasive method, therefore, if you want to select one of these two techniques, MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE is recommended.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YEGANEH LARI, A., OKHOVATIAN, F., NAIMI, S.S., & AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, A.R.. (2016). DRY NEEDLING VERSUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN TREATMENT OF LATENT TRIGGER POINT UPPER TRAPEZIUS. JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION, 10(1 ), 12-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/187213/en

Vancouver: Copy

YEGANEH LARI A., OKHOVATIAN F., NAIMI S.S., AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A.R.. DRY NEEDLING VERSUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN TREATMENT OF LATENT TRIGGER POINT UPPER TRAPEZIUS. JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION[Internet]. 2016;10(1 ):12-20. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/187213/en

IEEE: Copy

A. YEGANEH LARI, F. OKHOVATIAN, S.S. NAIMI, and A.R. AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, “DRY NEEDLING VERSUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN TREATMENT OF LATENT TRIGGER POINT UPPER TRAPEZIUS,” JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION, vol. 10, no. 1 , pp. 12–20, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/187213/en

Related Journal Papers