COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHON TREATINGCHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHANJANI ZEYNAB; MAHDAVIAN HOOSHANG; AHMADI PARICHEHR; HASHEMI TOORAJ; FATHOLLAHPOUR LEYLA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS Year:2013 | Volume:2 | Issue:8 Page(s): 117-147

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,532

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHON TREATINGCHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA

Author(s)

Keywords

NEUROFEEDBACKQ2

FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHQ2

DYSLEXIAQ2

Abstract

This study aims at comparingthe effect of NEUROFEEDBACK and FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACH on treatment of students with DYSLEXIA. For this purpose, six students (threegirls and three boys) with DYSLEXIA were selected by convenience sampling from five LD centers in Tabriz city and were randomly divided into three groups; each included one male and one female.The first group received both NEUROFEEDBACK treatment and Fernald’s method, while the second group received NEUROFEEDBACK treatment only and FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACH was applied tothe third group.In this empirical case study with single baseline design, Nama reading and DYSLEXIA test was used to evaluate students. Findings show that all subjects improved and the progresswas constant after two and three months. Eclectic treatment has the best results and students who received Fernald’s approach have better progress than those who received NEUROFEEDBACK. Also, while NEUROFEEDBACK improved comprehension and Fernald’s method helped students to develop expression skills, eclectic treatment affected both comprehension and expression skills.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHANJANI, ZEYNAB, MAHDAVIAN, HOOSHANG, AHMADI, PARICHEHR, HASHEMI, TOORAJ, & FATHOLLAHPOUR, LEYLA. (2013). COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHON TREATINGCHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA. PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, 2(8), 117-147. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/208357/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHANJANI ZEYNAB, MAHDAVIAN HOOSHANG, AHMADI PARICHEHR, HASHEMI TOORAJ, FATHOLLAHPOUR LEYLA. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHON TREATINGCHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA. PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS[Internet]. 2013;2(8):117-147. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/208357/en

IEEE: Copy

ZEYNAB KHANJANI, HOOSHANG MAHDAVIAN, PARICHEHR AHMADI, TOORAJ HASHEMI, and LEYLA FATHOLLAHPOUR, “COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK AND FERNALD’S MULTISENSORY APPROACHON TREATINGCHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA,” PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 117–147, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/208357/en

Related Journal Papers