MULTI-RATER EVALUATION IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NURSING STUDENTS: INSTRUCTORS EXPERIENCES AND VIEWPOINTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PAZARGADIE MEHRNOOSH; ASHKTORAB TAHEREH; KHOSRAVI SHARAREH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES Year:2012 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 102-111

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

983

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MULTI-RATER EVALUATION IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NURSING STUDENTS: INSTRUCTORS EXPERIENCES AND VIEWPOINTS

Author(s)

PAZARGADIE MEHRNOOSH | ASHKTORAB TAHEREH | KHOSRAVI SHARAREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICAL EVALUATIONQ3

NURSING STUDENTSQ2

MULTI-RATER EVALUATIONQ2

360-DEGREE EVALUATIONQ2

Abstract

Introduction: In clinical nursing education, evaluation is mostly the instructors responsibility. This process causes challenges for both instructors and students. It seems that, a way to confront these challenges is to use MULTI-RATER EVALUATION. The aim of this study is to investigate the experiences and viewpoints of nursing instructors of MULTI-RATER EVALUATION in the CLINICAL EVALUATION of NURSING STUDENTS.Method: This is a qualitative, descriptive study. Study samples were 14 nursing faculty members from nursing schools of Medical Sciences Universities in Tehran. They were selected by purposive sampling to the point of data saturation. Data was gathered through semistructured interviews. Data was analyzed by latent qualitative content analysis. First, each interview was read several times and the meaning units were found. Then, coding was done. Codes were categorized based on their similarities and themes, and created the categories.Results: Data analysis showed 3 themes including instructors centralization, challenges, and ability.Conclusion: The results of the current study showed most participants believed that the instructors have the most important role in student evaluation. Among other people, clinical nurses and students were also mentioned; the participants argued about some challenges these groups face and discussed their ability to participate in the evaluation. It is obvious that multirater evaluation, in the CLINICAL EVALUATION of NURSING STUDENTS, has positive aspects, but implementing this method needs planning and preparation.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PAZARGADIE, MEHRNOOSH, ASHKTORAB, TAHEREH, & KHOSRAVI, SHARAREH. (2012). MULTI-RATER EVALUATION IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NURSING STUDENTS: INSTRUCTORS EXPERIENCES AND VIEWPOINTS. JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES, 1(2), 102-111. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/215524/en

Vancouver: Copy

PAZARGADIE MEHRNOOSH, ASHKTORAB TAHEREH, KHOSRAVI SHARAREH. MULTI-RATER EVALUATION IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NURSING STUDENTS: INSTRUCTORS EXPERIENCES AND VIEWPOINTS. JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES[Internet]. 2012;1(2):102-111. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/215524/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHRNOOSH PAZARGADIE, TAHEREH ASHKTORAB, and SHARAREH KHOSRAVI, “MULTI-RATER EVALUATION IN THE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NURSING STUDENTS: INSTRUCTORS EXPERIENCES AND VIEWPOINTS,” JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 102–111, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/215524/en

Related Journal Papers