THE COMPARISON OF TEACHERS' VIEWS ABOUT THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL CURRICULUM OF FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF SHAHED UNIVERSITY SOBHANINEJAD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOBHANINEJAD M.; AHMADIAN M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Medical Education Development Year:2013 | Volume:6 | Issue:11 Page(s): 11-23

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

781

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF TEACHERS' VIEWS ABOUT THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL CURRICULUM OF FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF SHAHED UNIVERSITY SOBHANINEJAD

Author(s)

SOBHANINEJAD M. | AHMADIAN M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICAL CURRICULUMQ2

THEORETICAL EDUCATIONQ3

FACULTY MEMBERSQ2

MEDICAL COURSESQ2

UNIVERSITYQ1

Abstract

Objective: The CLINICAL CURRICULUM of medical teachers has to be in line with the theoretical curriculum. The present study has compared five aspects of the teachers' interaction between theoretical curriculum and the CLINICAL CURRICULUM.Materials and Method: The method was a descriptive survey. From the stager and intern students of Shahed UNIVERSITY, in the academic year 1391-92 (N=175), and with recourse to Krjsy and Morgan table, 120 samples were selected. The researcher-made questionnaire on the interactive aspects of the professors (with reliability confirmed by the experts) was used. Two sections of clinical and THEORETICAL EDUCATION with recourse to Cronbach alpha presented a validity of 0.97 and 0.95.Results: There existed a meaningful difference between the way of interaction of the professors with students, with their colleague, with people and with the two theoretical and CLINICAL CURRICULUMs. The rating average of professors' interactions in both types of curricula included the interaction of professors with the patients, with students, with themselves, with society and with colleagues. Thus, the differences in the various types of interactions in two curriculum types did not change the ratings.Conclusion: The decline in the interaction of professors with the students, society and themselves in CLINICAL CURRICULUM compared to that of the theoretical curriculum is the result of professors' paradoxical actions. Interestingly, the interaction with the college in CLINICAL CURRICULUM increases, which by itself is the sign of a paradox between the teaching and practicing of professors and bears various meanings from students' viewpoints.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADIAN, M., & SOBHANINEJAD, M.. (2013). THE COMPARISON OF TEACHERS' VIEWS ABOUT THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL CURRICULUM OF FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF SHAHED UNIVERSITY SOBHANINEJAD. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT, 6(11), 11-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/219380/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADIAN M., SOBHANINEJAD M.. THE COMPARISON OF TEACHERS' VIEWS ABOUT THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL CURRICULUM OF FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF SHAHED UNIVERSITY SOBHANINEJAD. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT[Internet]. 2013;6(11):11-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/219380/en

IEEE: Copy

M. AHMADIAN, and M. SOBHANINEJAD, “THE COMPARISON OF TEACHERS' VIEWS ABOUT THEORETICAL AND CLINICAL CURRICULUM OF FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES OF SHAHED UNIVERSITY SOBHANINEJAD,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 11–23, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/219380/en

Related Journal Papers