DIFFERENCES IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS HAND-TRACING METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NOURI M.; AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A.; HAMIDIAVAL SH.; HEMMATI SH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2011 | Volume:29 | Issue:2 (88) Page(s): 77-84

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

917

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DIFFERENCES IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS HAND-TRACING METHODS

Author(s)

NOURI M. | AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A. | HAMIDIAVAL SH. | HEMMATI SH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CEPHALOMETRICSQ2

ANALYSISQ3

MCNAMARAQ2

COMPUTERIZEDQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometric measurements using COMPUTERIZED tracing in comparison with hand tracing of radiographic printouts.Method & Materials: A sample was used, consisting of 90 standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs, obtaining from 10 years old male and female patients with normal skeletal and dental components. The radiographs were analyzed by two different observers. the first observes performed the manual and COMPUTERIZED tracings and then the procedure randomly rechecked by the second observer. A total of 13 anatomical landmarks of MCNAMARA ANALYSIS were located and angular and linear measurements were obtained. Measurement reproducibility was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Differences greater than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.Results: Significant differences were found between the methods for “Inferior Airway Space” in females. Cephalometric measurements of most parameters were reproducible for both methods.Conclusion: The study showed that confidence can be increased in tracings obtained from computer-assisted cephalometric ANALYSIS. as the discrepancies found between both manual and COMPUTERIZED, were mostly not statistically significant, any differences were minimal and clinically acceptable.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NOURI, M., AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, A., HAMIDIAVAL, SH., & HEMMATI, SH.. (2011). DIFFERENCES IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS HAND-TRACING METHODS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 29(2 (88)), 77-84. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21959/en

Vancouver: Copy

NOURI M., AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN A., HAMIDIAVAL SH., HEMMATI SH.. DIFFERENCES IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS HAND-TRACING METHODS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2011;29(2 (88)):77-84. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21959/en

IEEE: Copy

M. NOURI, A. AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, SH. HAMIDIAVAL, and SH. HEMMATI, “DIFFERENCES IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS HAND-TRACING METHODS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 29, no. 2 (88), pp. 77–84, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21959/en

Related Journal Papers