مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,675
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS

Pages

  81-94

Abstract

 Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital tracing software compared with equivalent hand traced measurements to determine the more accurate and useful method.Materials & Methods: Digital and analogue radiographic images of 30 orthodontic patients were obtained through SANDWICH TECHNIQUE (a conventional radiographic film and a digital image are produced simultaneously). Fifteen cephalometric landmarks were identified and 10 linear and angular measurements calculated, both manually and with digital tracing software. Measurement errors were assessed for each method by duplicating measurements of 15 randomly selected radiographs using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A paired t- test was used to detect differences between the manual and digital methods.Results: Differences between the two methods for SNA, U1-L1and Wit’s appraisal were statistically significant (P<0.05). In error measurements, an overall greater variability in the digital cephalometric measurements was found.Conclusion: The two tracing methods provided similar clinical results; therefore, efficient digital cephalometric software could be reliably chosen as a routine diagnostic tool due to its advantages (lower exposure to X-ray, image development bypass, image quality enhancement through computer).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    HEDAYATI, Z., SHAHIDI, SHOLEH, & RASAEI, SASAN. (2010). EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 34(1 (72)), 81-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73961/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HEDAYATI Z., SHAHIDI SHOLEH, RASAEI SASAN. EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2010;34(1 (72)):81-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73961/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. HEDAYATI, SHOLEH SHAHIDI, and SASAN RASAEI, “EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 34, no. 1 (72), pp. 81–94, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73961/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button