THE EFFECTS ONE PROUD STRENGTH TRAINING WHIT TWO LOADING PATTERNS (DOUBLE-PYRAMID & REVERSE STEP) EFFECTS ON SELECTED PHYSIOLOGIC ABILITIES OF YOUNG WRESTLERS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSINEI YAGHOB; MIRZAEI BAHMAN; NEMATI GHOLAMREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SPORT PHYSIOLOGY (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE) Year:2013 | Volume:4 | Issue:16 Page(s): 151-165

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,006

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFECTS ONE PROUD STRENGTH TRAINING WHIT TWO LOADING PATTERNS (DOUBLE-PYRAMID & REVERSE STEP) EFFECTS ON SELECTED PHYSIOLOGIC ABILITIES OF YOUNG WRESTLERS

Author(s)

HOSSINEI YAGHOB | MIRZAEI BAHMAN | NEMATI GHOLAMREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WRESTLINGQ2

RESISTANCE TRAININGQ2

DOUBLE-PYRAMID LOADING PATTERNQ2

REVERSE STEP LOADING PATTERNQ3

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigates the effects one proud strength training whit two loading patterns (double-pyramid & reverse step) were employed to study their effects on selected physiologic abilities of young wrestlers. For this purpose, 22 wrestlers volunteered to participate. Subjects (age 17.30±2.42 years; height 170.41±6.14 cm; weight 72.29±13 Kg; BMI 24.89±1.06 kg/m2 and BF% 12.39±7.39) had a history of at least 6 months of WRESTLING training. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups; a control group (n=8), and two RESISTANCE TRAINING groups: a group using the DP loading pattern (n=7); and a group using the RS loading pattern (n=7). The subjects trained for 8 weeks using two selected loading patterns. After assurance the normal data distribution (Kolmogorov– Smirnov test), ANOVA for repeated measurements, Tukey’s post-hoc test and independent-samples t test showed muscular strength and endurance, muscular mass and body compostion did not indicate any significant differences between the two training groups; however, this difference was significant for the control group (P³0.05). Studying the statistical test for "leg-power" indicated that no significant difference existed between the 3 groups; however, the difference between two groups of DP and control group was significant (P£0.05). In conclusion, it seems that both training models, were suitable for increasing strength, endurance, muscle mass and muscular power; and almost have similar benefit in physiologic factors of the athletes. However if the aim is increasing strength along with increasing muscular endurance, the RS model is more appropriate.

Cites

No record.

References