COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND SIMULATION TEACHING METHODS ON NURSINGSTUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE IN PERSONAL PROTECTION IN CHEMICAL ATTACKS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

EBADI M.; SHARIFIFAR S.T.; ZAREIYAN A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ebnesina Year:2014 | Volume:15 | Issue:4 (45) Page(s): 17-23

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

598

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND SIMULATION TEACHING METHODS ON NURSINGSTUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE IN PERSONAL PROTECTION IN CHEMICAL ATTACKS

Author(s)

EBADI M. | SHARIFIFAR S.T. | ZAREIYAN A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CHEMICAL WARFAREQ2

SAFETYQ2

NURSING STUDENTSQ1

Abstract

Background: Protections of individual and collective is the first step defense against contamination by chemical agents. This study was designed to compare the effect of conventional and simulation training on NURSING STUDENTS’ knowledge in Personal protection in chemical attacks.Materials and methods: In this training trial study, 78 NURSING STUDENTS from AJA University of Medical Sciences were selected and allocated randomly to two groups of simulation and conventional education. Data collection included a researcher-made questionnaire which was completed by NURSING STUDENTS before and two weeks after education. Its validity was determined by content validity method and its reliability by test/retest. Data was analyzed using descriptive and interpretive statistical methods by SPSS software.Results: Knowledge scores means in the two methods of simulation and conventional education increased from 22.67 and 21.95 (P=0.204) before education to 26.22 and 26.31 (P=0.846) after education. Mean scores of knowledge in the two methods significantly increased after education (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two methods concerning knowledge scores means.Conclusion: The present study showed that education is necessary for increasing knowledge, but there was no significant difference between the two methods concerning knowledge scores means in personal protection in chemical attacks.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

EBADI, M., SHARIFIFAR, S.T., & ZAREIYAN, A.. (2014). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND SIMULATION TEACHING METHODS ON NURSINGSTUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE IN PERSONAL PROTECTION IN CHEMICAL ATTACKS. EBNESINA, 15(4 (45)), 17-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/228580/en

Vancouver: Copy

EBADI M., SHARIFIFAR S.T., ZAREIYAN A.. COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND SIMULATION TEACHING METHODS ON NURSINGSTUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE IN PERSONAL PROTECTION IN CHEMICAL ATTACKS. EBNESINA[Internet]. 2014;15(4 (45)):17-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/228580/en

IEEE: Copy

M. EBADI, S.T. SHARIFIFAR, and A. ZAREIYAN, “COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND SIMULATION TEACHING METHODS ON NURSINGSTUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE IN PERSONAL PROTECTION IN CHEMICAL ATTACKS,” EBNESINA, vol. 15, no. 4 (45), pp. 17–23, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/228580/en

Related Journal Papers