A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY IN SPECIALIZED MEDICAL SEARCH AND GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING MEDICAL IMAGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIRGOOD SEIED HOSSEIN; GHIASI MITRA; DALIRI SAEID; KOUCHAKINEJAD ERAMSADATI LEILA; ABBASIAN JOUSHGHANI AMANEH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of JundiShapur Educational Development Year:2015 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 Page(s): 131-138

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,947

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY IN SPECIALIZED MEDICAL SEARCH AND GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING MEDICAL IMAGE

Author(s)

Keywords

SPECIALIZED SEARCH ENGINESQ2

GENERAL SEARCH ENGINESQ2

RETRIEVAL IMAGESQ2

FALSE DROPSQ2

Abstract

This study aimed at comparing and determining the precision of general and specialized medical search engines for medical image retrieval. In an applied research using webometrics, 9 keywords of lung, cancers, and cardiovascular diseases and disorders were selected after consultation with Radiologist. Keywords were searched in general engines of Google, Yahoo and Bing and specialized engines of Omni Medical Search, GoldMiner, Searching radiology and Yottalook. Data collection tool was a checklist, and statistical analysis was performed by SPSS and Chi-square test. The result of this study showed that among the specialized medical search engines and out of 945 image retrieval cases, Searching Radiology Engine had the most accuracy. Also, among the general searching engines, Yahoo was the most accurate with 73%. Based on Chi-square test, there was no significant difference in accuracy for each keyword in specialized and GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES (P>0.05). Omni Medical Search engine with 47%, Yottalook with 41% and Bing with 36% had the highest number of FALSE DROPS, respectively. Google with 27%, Searching radiology with 26%, and Yahoo with 26% had the lowest number of FALSE DROPS, too. Generally, among SPECIALIZED SEARCH ENGINES, Searching radiology had the most accuracy, in addition, Yahoo were the most accurate among GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MIRGOOD, SEIED HOSSEIN, GHIASI, MITRA, DALIRI, SAEID, KOUCHAKINEJAD ERAMSADATI, LEILA, & ABBASIAN JOUSHGHANI, AMANEH. (2015). A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY IN SPECIALIZED MEDICAL SEARCH AND GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING MEDICAL IMAGE. EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF JUNDISHAPUR, 6(2), 131-138. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/228810/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIRGOOD SEIED HOSSEIN, GHIASI MITRA, DALIRI SAEID, KOUCHAKINEJAD ERAMSADATI LEILA, ABBASIAN JOUSHGHANI AMANEH. A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY IN SPECIALIZED MEDICAL SEARCH AND GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING MEDICAL IMAGE. EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF JUNDISHAPUR[Internet]. 2015;6(2):131-138. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/228810/en

IEEE: Copy

SEIED HOSSEIN MIRGOOD, MITRA GHIASI, SAEID DALIRI, LEILA KOUCHAKINEJAD ERAMSADATI, and AMANEH ABBASIAN JOUSHGHANI, “A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY IN SPECIALIZED MEDICAL SEARCH AND GENERAL SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING MEDICAL IMAGE,” EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF JUNDISHAPUR, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/228810/en

Related Journal Papers