RELIABILITY CALCULATION THE MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY INTO RESULTANT WORK METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THE COMMON METHOD DURING ONE RUNNING STEP

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESLAMI MANSOUR; JAHEDI VAHID; NAZARI MOHSEN; GANDOMKAR AMIN; FARSAD ABBAS; TAZIKEH ZEINAB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH SPORT REHABILITATION Year:2014 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 39-48

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

738

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RELIABILITY CALCULATION THE MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY INTO RESULTANT WORK METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THE COMMON METHOD DURING ONE RUNNING STEP

Author(s)

Keywords

MECHANICAL ENERGYQ2

MECHANICAL WORKQ2

METABOLIC COSTQ2

MECHANICAL EFFICIENCYQ2

RUNNING STEPQ2

Abstract

Background and aim: The common methods to evaluate MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY include METABOLIC COST assessment and calculation of MECHANICAL ENERGY ﬂuctuations. However, these methods are limited to aerobic activities as well as time consuming, and limit subject motions. The purpose of this study were 1) to present a new method in calculating MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY by using resultant work approach and, 2) to assessed its reliability.Materials and Methods: 16 active, normal, healthy male students were selected in this study. Kinematics and kinetics variables, as well as, METABOLIC COST were recorded using cameras (JVC, 200 HZ), a force plate (Kistler, 1000 HZ) and K4b2 gas analysis device, respectively. MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY in the new approach was calculated dividing work on COM by the total MECHANICAL ENERGY. Work on COM was assessed using point-mass method, and the total MECHANICAL ENERGY was calculated by inverse dynamic approach. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test research hypothesis (p£0.05).Results: A significant correlation wasn't observed between MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY in the common method and MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY in the new method (r=0.31, p=0.26).Conclusion: The finding indicats that calculated resultant work approach in one step of gait cannot be an indicator of MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESLAMI, MANSOUR, JAHEDI, VAHID, NAZARI, MOHSEN, GANDOMKAR, AMIN, FARSAD, ABBAS, & TAZIKEH, ZEINAB. (2014). RELIABILITY CALCULATION THE MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY INTO RESULTANT WORK METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THE COMMON METHOD DURING ONE RUNNING STEP. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH SPORT REHABILITATION, 1(2), 39-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/252211/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESLAMI MANSOUR, JAHEDI VAHID, NAZARI MOHSEN, GANDOMKAR AMIN, FARSAD ABBAS, TAZIKEH ZEINAB. RELIABILITY CALCULATION THE MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY INTO RESULTANT WORK METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THE COMMON METHOD DURING ONE RUNNING STEP. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH SPORT REHABILITATION[Internet]. 2014;1(2):39-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/252211/en

IEEE: Copy

MANSOUR ESLAMI, VAHID JAHEDI, MOHSEN NAZARI, AMIN GANDOMKAR, ABBAS FARSAD, and ZEINAB TAZIKEH, “RELIABILITY CALCULATION THE MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY INTO RESULTANT WORK METHOD IN COMPARISON WITH THE COMMON METHOD DURING ONE RUNNING STEP,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH SPORT REHABILITATION, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 39–48, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/252211/en

Related Journal Papers