A COMPARISON BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN DENTINAL CARIES REMOVAL (INVITRO)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHAMVERDI Z.; AMINI B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION OF IRAN (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI) Year:2004 | Volume:16 | Issue:1 (48) Page(s): 40-46

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

732

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN DENTINAL CARIES REMOVAL (INVITRO)

Author(s)

KHAMVERDI Z. | AMINI B. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TOOTH CARIESQ2

MECHANICAL METHODQ4

CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODQ4

CARISOLTMQ4

Abstract

Aim & Background: CHEMOMECHANICAL METHOD refers to the chemical removal of the decayed dentin and then to the slow elimination of caries with hand instruments conservatively.The goal of this study was to compare the remaining dentinal caries between this method and the conventional MECHANICAL METHOD using burs.Methods & Materials: The samples of the first group were treated by CHEMOMECHANICAL METHOD applying CARISOLTM gel whereas those of the second group were treated by MECHANICAL METHOD using burs. After caries removal, the samples were suctioned and examined by stereo microscope.The data were submitted to statistical analyses (X2 and Mamm - Withney U tests). The frequency of the remaining caries, for both groups, was 23.3%, howerer, the surface area of the remaining caries in mechanical and chemomechanical groups were 0.049 and 0.008 mm, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant.Results: The results of this study no significant differences between two methods.Conclusion: CHEMOMECHANICAL METHOD as a suitable substituted for the conventional method in caries removal.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHAMVERDI, Z., & AMINI, B.. (2004). A COMPARISON BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN DENTINAL CARIES REMOVAL (INVITRO). JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 16(1 (48)), 40-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54934/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHAMVERDI Z., AMINI B.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN DENTINAL CARIES REMOVAL (INVITRO). JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2004;16(1 (48)):40-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54934/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. KHAMVERDI, and B. AMINI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN DENTINAL CARIES REMOVAL (INVITRO),” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 16, no. 1 (48), pp. 40–46, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54934/en

Related Journal Papers