Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Open Mini-Access Ureterolithotomy in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Meitei Sholay Kangjam; Lodh Bijit; Khumukcham Somarendra; GUPTA SANDEEP; Singh Kaku Akoijam; Sinam Rajendra Singh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: UROLOGY JOURNAL Year:2014 | Volume:11 | Issue:3 Page(s): 1583-1588

Download Full-Text

View:

183

Download:

104

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Open Mini-Access Ureterolithotomy in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Author(s)

Keywords

ureteral calculi

surgery

treatment outcome

pain

postoperative

length of stay

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety evaluation of mini-access ureterolithotomy in the management of ureteric calculus. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Urology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal. A total number of one hundred and forty three patients with radiologically confirmed ureteral calculus (size > 1 cm) were enrolled in this study. Results: The mean age of male and female patients was 44. 97 ± 11. 24 and 43. 89 ± 14. 49 years, respectively. In the majority of cases stone was in the upper ureter irrespective of the side. The stone size ranged from 10 to 30 mm in diameter. The most common indication for open mini-access ureterolithotomy in the present study was impacted large stone (45%). The mean operation duration was 25. 39 ± 5. 11 min, with an incision length of 4. 78 ± 0. 25 mm; the estimated blood loss was 50. 55 ± 8 mL and none of the patient’ s required post-operative blood transfusion. The overall complication rate was 5. 6%. Conclusion: Open mini-access ureterolithotomy is a safe procedure with fewer complications and cosmetically acceptable results. Although in this minimally invasive era, the specific indications for open stone surgery are a few, but when the situation mandates, an open mini-access ureterolithotomy might be considered the best option.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Meitei, Sholay Kangjam, Lodh, Bijit, Khumukcham, Somarendra, GUPTA, SANDEEP, Singh, Kaku Akoijam, & Sinam, Rajendra Singh. (2014). Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Open Mini-Access Ureterolithotomy in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 11(3), 1583-1588. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/271110/en

Vancouver: Copy

Meitei Sholay Kangjam, Lodh Bijit, Khumukcham Somarendra, GUPTA SANDEEP, Singh Kaku Akoijam, Sinam Rajendra Singh. Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Open Mini-Access Ureterolithotomy in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;11(3):1583-1588. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/271110/en

IEEE: Copy

Sholay Kangjam Meitei, Bijit Lodh, Somarendra Khumukcham, SANDEEP GUPTA, Kaku Akoijam Singh, and Rajendra Singh Sinam, “Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Open Mini-Access Ureterolithotomy in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1583–1588, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/271110/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops