مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

347
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

214
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE AND ODDS RATIO SHOULD BE USED WITH CAUTION (LETTER TO EDITOR)

Pages

  757-757

Keywords

Abstract

 Dear Editor: We read with interest the article by Abu El Makarem MA et al. (1) entitled, “Platelet count/bipolar spleen diameter ratio for the prediction of esophageal varices: The special Egyptian situation.” This study evaluated noninvasive predictors of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients by multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. However, in our opinion, some aspects of the statistical analysis could be clarified. The first issue concerns the ROC analysis.The full area under the ROC curve (AUC) is a measure of the performance of the diagnostic test because it reflects the test performance at all possible cutoff levels.The AUC lies in the interval [0.5, 1], and the larger area, the better performance. A perfect test has an AUC of 1.0, whereas random chance gives an AUC of 0.5 (2, 3). In Abu El Makarem MA et al.’s paper, the AUC for age is 0.33, which is less than 0.5. Therefore, we think that something might have gone wrong when the authors performed the ROC analysis with the SPSS software. Because both the univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression identified age as a valuable predictor of varices, older patients experienced a higher risk having varices. We presume that the AUC for age may be 0.67 (1-0.33) rather than 0.33. The second issue has to do with the odds ratio. The odds ratio refers to a ratio of the odds of the outcome occurring in one group divided by the odds of the outcome occurring in the other group with a 1-unit increase in x (4). The odds ratio for age was 1.205 in Abu El Makarem MA et al.’s (1) paper, but no statement such as “for a one year increase in age” was mentioned.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HONG, WANDONG, WU, JIANSHENG, & CHEN, XIANGRONG. (2011). RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE AND ODDS RATIO SHOULD BE USED WITH CAUTION (LETTER TO EDITOR). HEPATITIS MONTHLY, 11(9 (38)), 757-757. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/306449/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HONG WANDONG, WU JIANSHENG, CHEN XIANGRONG. RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE AND ODDS RATIO SHOULD BE USED WITH CAUTION (LETTER TO EDITOR). HEPATITIS MONTHLY[Internet]. 2011;11(9 (38)):757-757. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/306449/en

    IEEE: Copy

    WANDONG HONG, JIANSHENG WU, and XIANGRONG CHEN, “RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE AND ODDS RATIO SHOULD BE USED WITH CAUTION (LETTER TO EDITOR),” HEPATITIS MONTHLY, vol. 11, no. 9 (38), pp. 757–757, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/306449/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    email sharing button
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button