ASSESSMENT OF THREE “WHO” PATIENT SAFETY SOLUTIONS: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHAT CAN WE DO?

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BANIHASHEMI SHEIDA; HATAM NAHID; ZAND FARID; KHARAZMI ERFAN; NASIMI SOHEILA; ASKARIAN MEHRDAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Preventive Medicine Year:2015 | Volume:6 | Issue:- Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

260

Download:

123

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSMENT OF THREE “WHO” PATIENT SAFETY SOLUTIONS: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHAT CAN WE DO?

Author(s)

Keywords

HAND HYGIENE

PATIENT HAND‑OVER

PATIENT SAFETY

PROCEDURE ERRORS

Abstract

Background: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare thecurrent execution of the 3 PATIENT SAFETY solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards.Methods: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status ofimplementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools.Results: In the field of PATIENT HAND‑OVER, there was no standardized approach. In the field ofthe performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure.In the field of HAND HYGIENE (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard.Conclusions: There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in allthree areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve PATIENT SAFETY by theimplementation of adapted WHO suggested actions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BANIHASHEMI, SHEIDA, HATAM, NAHID, ZAND, FARID, KHARAZMI, ERFAN, NASIMI, SOHEILA, & ASKARIAN, MEHRDAD. (2015). ASSESSMENT OF THREE “WHO” PATIENT SAFETY SOLUTIONS: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHAT CAN WE DO?. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 6(-), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/316406/en

Vancouver: Copy

BANIHASHEMI SHEIDA, HATAM NAHID, ZAND FARID, KHARAZMI ERFAN, NASIMI SOHEILA, ASKARIAN MEHRDAD. ASSESSMENT OF THREE “WHO” PATIENT SAFETY SOLUTIONS: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHAT CAN WE DO?. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE[Internet]. 2015;6(-):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/316406/en

IEEE: Copy

SHEIDA BANIHASHEMI, NAHID HATAM, FARID ZAND, ERFAN KHARAZMI, SOHEILA NASIMI, and MEHRDAD ASKARIAN, “ASSESSMENT OF THREE “WHO” PATIENT SAFETY SOLUTIONS: WHERE DO WE STAND AND WHAT CAN WE DO?,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, vol. 6, no. -, pp. 0–0, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/316406/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops