PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS: BULK-FILL COMPOSITE VERSUS CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

OZYUREK TAHA; USLU GULSAH; YILMAZ KORAY

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, DENTAL CLINICS, DENTAL PROSPECTS Year:2018 | Volume:12 | Issue:1 Page(s): 6-11

Download Full-Text

View:

261

Download:

226

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS: BULK-FILL COMPOSITE VERSUS CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT

Author(s)

OZYUREK TAHA | USLU GULSAH | YILMAZ KORAY | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BULK-FILL COMPOSITE

CALCIUM SILICATE

PUSH-OUT

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strengths of calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins.Methods: Twenty-four single-rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were instrumented using rotary files. Thereafter, a parallel post drill was used to obtain a standardized root canal dimension. The roots were randomly assigned to one of the following groups with respect to the intra-orifice barrier used: ProRoot MTA; Biodentine; SureFil SDR; EverX Posterior. Five 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from the coronal aspect of each root. Push-out bond strength testing was performed and data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests (P<0.05).Results: SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins’ bond strengths were significantly higher than ProRoot MTA and Biodentine calcium silicate cements. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between bulk-fill composite resins values and calcium silicate cement values.Conclusion: Within the limitations of present study, calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA cement’s push-out bond strength was lower than those of Biodentine, SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior materials.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

OZYUREK, TAHA, USLU, GULSAH, & YILMAZ, KORAY. (2018). PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS: BULK-FILL COMPOSITE VERSUS CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, DENTAL CLINICS, DENTAL PROSPECTS, 12(1), 6-11. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/323949/en

Vancouver: Copy

OZYUREK TAHA, USLU GULSAH, YILMAZ KORAY. PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS: BULK-FILL COMPOSITE VERSUS CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, DENTAL CLINICS, DENTAL PROSPECTS[Internet]. 2018;12(1):6-11. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/323949/en

IEEE: Copy

TAHA OZYUREK, GULSAH USLU, and KORAY YILMAZ, “PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS: BULK-FILL COMPOSITE VERSUS CALCIUM SILICATE CEMENT,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, DENTAL CLINICS, DENTAL PROSPECTS, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 6–11, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/323949/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops