FAIR PROCESSES FOR PRIORITY SETTING: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE COMMENT ON

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JANSEN MAARTEN P.; HELDERMAN JAN KEES; BOER BERT; BALTUSSEN ROB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2017 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 Page(s): 43-47

Download Full-Text

View:

218

Download:

148

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FAIR PROCESSES FOR PRIORITY SETTING: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE COMMENT ON "EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY"

Author(s)

JANSEN MAARTEN P. | HELDERMAN JAN KEES | BOER BERT | BALTUSSEN ROB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRIORITY SETTING

HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA)

VALUES

HTA AS LEARNING

FAIR PROCESSES

EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES

Abstract

Embedding health technology assessment (HTA) in a fair process has great potential to capture societal VALUES relevant to public reimbursement decisions on health technologies. However, the development of such processes for PRIORITY SETTING has largely been theoretical. In this paper, we provide further practical lead ways on how these processes can be implemented. We first present the misconception about the relation between facts and VALUES that is since long misleading the conduct of HTA and underlies the current assessment-appraisal split. We then argue that HTA should instead be explicitly organized as an ongoing evidence-informed deliberative process, that facilitates learning among stakeholders. This has important consequences for whose VALUES to consider, how to deal with vested interests, how to consider all VALUES in the decision-making process, and how to communicate decisions. This is in stark contrast to how HTA processes are implemented now. It is time to set the stage for HTA AS LEARNING.

Cites

Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JANSEN, MAARTEN P., HELDERMAN, JAN KEES, BOER, BERT, & BALTUSSEN, ROB. (2017). FAIR PROCESSES FOR PRIORITY SETTING: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE COMMENT ON "EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY". INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 6(1), 43-47. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338514/en

Vancouver: Copy

JANSEN MAARTEN P., HELDERMAN JAN KEES, BOER BERT, BALTUSSEN ROB. FAIR PROCESSES FOR PRIORITY SETTING: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE COMMENT ON "EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY". INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2017;6(1):43-47. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338514/en

IEEE: Copy

MAARTEN P. JANSEN, JAN KEES HELDERMAN, BERT BOER, and ROB BALTUSSEN, “FAIR PROCESSES FOR PRIORITY SETTING: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE COMMENT ON "EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY",” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338514/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops