مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

293
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

110
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE SECURING TECHNIQUES: FIXING BANDAGE VS. ADHESIVE TAPE

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Introduction: Emergency physicians should secure Endotracheal tubes (ETT) properly in order to prevent unplanned extubation (UE) and its complications. Despite various available endotracheal tube holders, using BANDAGES or tape are still the most common methods used in this regards.Objective: This study aimed to compare adhesive tape (AT) versus fixing bandage (FB) method in terms of properly securing ETT.Methods: This was an observational longitudinal trial. All patients older than 15-years-old admitted to the ED who had indication for ETT insertion were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups in which AT or FB was applied. All patients were observed thoroughly in the first 24 hours after INTUBATION. Using a pre-prepared checklist, encountered UE rate and other data were recorded.Results: Seventy-two patients with the mean age of 55.98 ± 18.39 years were finally evaluated of which 38 cases (52.8%) were male. In total, 12% of patients in our study experienced unplanned extubation. Less than 12% of the patients experienced complete UE, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.24). Comparison of UE with age showed no significant difference (p=0.89). Male patients experienced more UE, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.44).Conclusion: It is likely that whether the AT method or FB was applied for securing the ETT in emergency departments, there was no significant difference in rates of unplanned extubation.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SEYEDHOSSEINI, JAVAD, AHMADI, MOJTABA, NEJATI, AMIR, ARDALAN, ALI, GHAFARI, MOHAMMADHOSSEIN, & VAHIDI, ELNAZ. (2017). TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE SECURING TECHNIQUES: FIXING BANDAGE VS. ADHESIVE TAPE. (FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE) ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/351038/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SEYEDHOSSEINI JAVAD, AHMADI MOJTABA, NEJATI AMIR, ARDALAN ALI, GHAFARI MOHAMMADHOSSEIN, VAHIDI ELNAZ. TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE SECURING TECHNIQUES: FIXING BANDAGE VS. ADHESIVE TAPE. (FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE) ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE[Internet]. 2017;1(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/351038/en

    IEEE: Copy

    JAVAD SEYEDHOSSEINI, MOJTABA AHMADI, AMIR NEJATI, ALI ARDALAN, MOHAMMADHOSSEIN GHAFARI, and ELNAZ VAHIDI, “TWO DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE SECURING TECHNIQUES: FIXING BANDAGE VS. ADHESIVE TAPE,” (FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE) ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/351038/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button