A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TWO CLINICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AGHABABAII S.; ZAMANPARVAR A.R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Year:2003 | Volume:11 | Issue:3 SUPPLEMENT (SPL ISS 2, NURSING AND MIDWIFERY) Page(s): 68-72

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

931

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TWO CLINICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT

Author(s)

AGHABABAII S. | ZAMANPARVAR A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICAL METHODQ4

UTERINE FUNDAL HEIGHTQ4

ABDOMINAL GIRTHQ4

JOHNSON’S RULEQ4

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive, analytical study was to compare two clinical methods (uterine fundal height multiplied by ABDOMINAL GIRTH and JOHNSON’S RULE) for estimation of fetal weight in women who referred to Fatemieh hospital in Hamadan for delivery in 2000. In this study, 100 primipara and 100 multipara with normal pregnancies were chosen randomly. Measurement of the UTERINE FUNDAL HEIGHT multiplied by ABDOMINAL GIRTH and JOHNSON’S RULE predicted the ‘large for birth’ neonates with a sensitivity of 83.3% & 66%, and specificity of 86.5%&86%, respectively. In prediction of ‘low birth weight’ neonates, the fundal height multiplied by ABDOMINAL GIRTH and JOHNSON’S RULE showed sensitivity of 38.4% & 15.3% and specificity of 96.2% & 97.3% respectively. According to the results obtained, UTERINE FUNDAL HEIGHT multiplied by ABDOMINAL GIRTH was better than JOHNSON’S RULE for estimation of fetal weight .The fundal height multiplied by ABDOMINAL GIRTH has thus been found to be useful as a screening method for detection of abnormal size at birth.

Cites

No record.

References

مقایسه دو روش تخمین بالینی وزن جنین

Cite

APA: Copy

AGHABABAII, S., & ZAMANPARVAR, A.R.. (2003). A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TWO CLINICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT . JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 11(3 SUPPLEMENT (SPL ISS 2, NURSING AND MIDWIFERY)), 68-72. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/35806/en

Vancouver: Copy

AGHABABAII S., ZAMANPARVAR A.R.. A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TWO CLINICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT . JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2003;11(3 SUPPLEMENT (SPL ISS 2, NURSING AND MIDWIFERY)):68-72. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/35806/en

IEEE: Copy

S. AGHABABAII, and A.R. ZAMANPARVAR, “A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TWO CLINICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT ,” JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 3 SUPPLEMENT (SPL ISS 2, NURSING AND MIDWIFERY), pp. 68–72, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/35806/en

Related Journal Papers