مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

369
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III and Mortality Probability Model-III in Trauma Patients

Pages

  350-356

Abstract

 Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) is among the most important hospital wards. Variety of scoring systems for evaluation of patients' status and prediction of hospitalization outcomes in ICU has been raised that each has strong and weak points; assessment of these characteristics tends to promote new scoring systems. The current study compared scoring systems of Mortality Probability Model-III (MPM-III) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III (SAPS-III) in trauma patients in ICU. Methods: This randomized cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 patients admitted in ICU because of trauma in years 2016-17. Patients' information including demographics, mean of systolic, diastolic, and arterial blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, temperature, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), arterial gas analysis, white blood cell (WBC) counts, hematocrit, bilirubin, creatinine, type of admission, and presence of underlying diseases were extracted from records; MPM-III and SAPS-III were measured for these patients and compared. Findings: MPM-III scoring system had discrimination of 0. 935 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0. 89-0. 97; P < 0. 001) in cut-off point of 0. 13, and its sensitivity and specificity was 87% and 84%, respectively. For SAPS-III system, in cut-off point of 0. 13, the discrimination was 0. 77 (95%CI: 0. 69-0. 85; P < 0. 001), with the sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 68%. Based on both MPM-III and SAPS-III systems, Mortality was in correlation with duration of ICU admission (P = 0. 001 for both systems) and duration of intubation (P < 0. 001 for both systems), while only for SAPS-III, total duration of hospitalization was in correlation with Mortality (P < 0. 001). Conclusion: MPM-III scoring system was superior to SAPS-III regarding discrimination power in trauma patients. In addition, based on both systems, Mortality rate was in direct association with days of ICU admission and intubation duration.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAZEMROAYA, BEHZAD, KASHEFI, PARVIZ, & BABAEI, HAMIDEH. (2019). Comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III and Mortality Probability Model-III in Trauma Patients. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 37(522 ), 350-356. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/363349/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAZEMROAYA BEHZAD, KASHEFI PARVIZ, BABAEI HAMIDEH. Comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III and Mortality Probability Model-III in Trauma Patients. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2019;37(522 ):350-356. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/363349/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BEHZAD NAZEMROAYA, PARVIZ KASHEFI, and HAMIDEH BABAEI, “Comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score-III and Mortality Probability Model-III in Trauma Patients,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 37, no. 522 , pp. 350–356, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/363349/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top