Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sanei Zohre

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES Year:2018 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 Page(s): 97-105

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

407

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members

Author(s)

Sanei Zohre | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EvaluationQ2

Scientific QualityQ1

Teaching QualityQ2

StudentQ2

LecturerQ2

Abstract

Introduction: In every educational system, educators are one of the effective components in the learning process. Therefore survey the quality of their performance should be considered by educational planner to improve the universities. The goal of the present study is Students’ standpoint about qualitative assessment of performance of faculty members to inform them of their performance. Methods: The total statistical population for the study consisted of 1159 Students at Shahid Hasheminejad’ s female campus of Farhangian University in the 2016-2017 academic year. The sampling method was random stratified based on the field of study of 288 participants. The data was gathered using a questionnaire, which consisted of questions on personal attributes, assessment of performance of faculty members and the method of questionnaire completion. The validity of the contents of the questionnaire was confirmed by seeking opinion of the experts and its reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha (0. 87) test. The needed data were collected by a questionnaire after confirming its validity and reliability. To analyze the data, statistical indices such as mean, standard deviation and Pearson correlation coefficient using Spss version 24 was used. Results: Personality of faculty members with an average 68. 71% and standard deviation of 0. 97 is the most important and teaching method, and Evaluation with an average 47. 28% and standard deviation of 1. 05 is the less important dimensions from Students’ standpoint. No Significant correlation was observed between Students’ standpoints and their GPA (p = 0. 716 & r = 0. 03). Conclusions: According to the results, Lecturers need mechanisms such as retraining and continuous instructions to improve the quality of teaching.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Sanei, Zohre. (2018). Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, 11(2 ), 97-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/388582/en

Vancouver: Copy

Sanei Zohre. Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES[Internet]. 2018;11(2 ):97-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/388582/en

IEEE: Copy

Zohre Sanei, “Students’ Standpoint about Qualitative Assessment of Performance of Faculty Members,” EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, vol. 11, no. 2 , pp. 97–105, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/388582/en

Related Journal Papers