مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

11,080
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CIPROFLOXACIN OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION 0.3% WITH FORTIFIED CEPHAZOLIN-GENTAMICIN IN TREATING BACTERIAL CORNEAL ULCER

Pages

  1-9

Abstract

 Background: Bacterial corneal ulcer is a common ophthalmic problem. Still controversies are exist for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer, thus, the present study was carried out in Namazi Hospital in Shiraz to determine the efficacy and side effects of CIPROFLOXACIN ophthalmic solution 0.3% and compare this with fortified CEPHAZOLIN-gentamicin.Materials and methods: It was a clinical trial. Having the physical examination and patient's history completed, two samples were obtained for culture and smear. Patients were randomly distributed in two groups. One received the standard protocol (Cephazolin 5% and Gentamicin 9% ophthalmic solutions) and the other was given CIPROFLOXACIN ophthalmic solution 03%.Efficacy was evaluated according to the days of treatment and side effects were surveyedby eye burning and white deposit.Results: Of 45 cases, 6 were excluded due to the altered regimen. Of 39 studied cases, 20 received CIPROFLOXACIN ophthalmic solution 0.3% and the remaining 19 were - given standard regimen. Success rate was 90% and 89.5% for the CIPROFLOXACIN and Standard regimen, respectively (NS). Eye burning was reported 5% and 36.8%, respectively, meanwhile, white deposits were reported in 36.8% of patients who have received standard regimen (p<0.02). Of cultured bacteria, one had shown intermediate resistance to CIPROFLOXACIN, however, resistance was noted to cephalexin and gentamicin.Conclusion: Ciprotloxacin can be a suitable alternative for fortified CEPHAZOLIN-gentamicin sine it has better outcome, and less side effects. Further studies are highly recommended.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NEJABAT, M., ALBORZI, A., & RAZEGHINEZHAD, M.R.. (2002). COMPARISON OF CIPROFLOXACIN OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION 0.3% WITH FORTIFIED CEPHAZOLIN-GENTAMICIN IN TREATING BACTERIAL CORNEAL ULCER. FEYZ, 6(21), 1-9. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/40738/en

Vancouver: Copy

NEJABAT M., ALBORZI A., RAZEGHINEZHAD M.R.. COMPARISON OF CIPROFLOXACIN OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION 0.3% WITH FORTIFIED CEPHAZOLIN-GENTAMICIN IN TREATING BACTERIAL CORNEAL ULCER. FEYZ[Internet]. 2002;6(21):1-9. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/40738/en

IEEE: Copy

M. NEJABAT, A. ALBORZI, and M.R. RAZEGHINEZHAD, “COMPARISON OF CIPROFLOXACIN OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION 0.3% WITH FORTIFIED CEPHAZOLIN-GENTAMICIN IN TREATING BACTERIAL CORNEAL ULCER,” FEYZ, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 1–9, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/40738/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button