مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,604
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CERVIX BRUSH WITH SPATULA AYRES FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS

Pages

  32-37

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Cervical smears contain endocervical cells which are accepted as representatives for cytological diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the adequacy of cervical cytology sampling and endocervical cells together; using two sampling instruments, namely CERVIX BRUSH and Ayres Spatula. Materials and Method: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, PAP SMEARs of 184 women referring to family planning and health center were obtained by means of Ayres Spatula (95 cases), and CERVIX BRUSH (89 cases). The cases were randomly chosen from the total population for CERVIX BRUSH or Ayres Spatula cytology sampling. The pathologist, however, was unaware of the kind of device used for each smear. The pathologist interpreted PAP SMEAR quality, endocervical and transduction zone count, bleeding cell count; and squamous cell count. Besides, cell changes were measured according to Betsa system. Finally, the obtained data was analysed through Fisher, Chi-square, and T-test at the significant level P≤0.05.Results: The quality of cells present in the smears was alike in both groups. In CERVIX BRUSH group endocervical cells were found in 91% of the cases, and metaplastic cells in 19.1% but 78.9% and 13.7% of spatula samples were endocervical and metaplastic respectively. Thus, the difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.02). Less patients (8.5%) in CERVIX BRUSH and more (22.2%) in spatula group reported discomfort. There was a significant difference between the two methods (cervix brush and SPATULA AYRES) regarding ease of application and extent of pain (P=0.01).Conclusion: On the basis of the findings of the study CERVIX BRUSH is superior to Ayres Spatula in obtaining endocervical smears.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AGHAJANI DELAVAR, M., SHAFIGH, E., & MOHAMMADPOUR TAHAMTAN, R.A.. (2006). COMPARISON OF CERVIX BRUSH WITH SPATULA AYRES FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS. JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 13(1), 32-37. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/408318/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AGHAJANI DELAVAR M., SHAFIGH E., MOHAMMADPOUR TAHAMTAN R.A.. COMPARISON OF CERVIX BRUSH WITH SPATULA AYRES FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS. JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;13(1):32-37. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/408318/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. AGHAJANI DELAVAR, E. SHAFIGH, and R.A. MOHAMMADPOUR TAHAMTAN, “COMPARISON OF CERVIX BRUSH WITH SPATULA AYRES FOR OBTAINING ENDOCERVICAL CELLS,” JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/408318/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button