EVALUATION OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REFERRED TO THE IRAN MEDICAL COUNCIL DURING YEARS 2003 TO 2008

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MANSOURI M.R.; TABATABAEI A.; SAMIMI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2012 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 (69) Page(s): 374-379

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

758

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REFERRED TO THE IRAN MEDICAL COUNCIL DURING YEARS 2003 TO 2008

Author(s)

MANSOURI M.R. | TABATABAEI A. | SAMIMI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

OPHTHALMOLOGYQ3

MEDICAL MALPRACTICEQ3

MEDICAL COUNCILQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate malpractice complaints against ophthalmologist referred to the IRI.Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on MEDICAL COUNCIL during years 2003 to 2008. SPSS software was used for analysis.Results: During this period from 1869 cases of malpractice 115 (%6.1) have been related to the field of OPHTHALMOLOGY but in order to some problems we can’t analysis 24 files. Out of 91 cases, 10.1% of them have been related to university centers, 58.3% related to non- university centers and 30.7% related to private centers, however malpractice rate in these centers have been 20%, 28.3% and 35.8%. The highest rate of filed complains was related to the cataract surgery (46.1%) follow by refractive error (16.4%) and eye trauma (10.1%).Conclusion: Ensure that patients fully understand the specific risks associated with the procedure, good communication and behavior with patients and their companions and performing adequate physical examination have significant effect on the decreasing of malpractice complaints against ophthalmologist.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MANSOURI, M.R., TABATABAEI, A., & SAMIMI, M.. (2012). EVALUATION OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REFERRED TO THE IRAN MEDICAL COUNCIL DURING YEARS 2003 TO 2008. BINA, 17(4 (69)), 374-379. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42783/en

Vancouver: Copy

MANSOURI M.R., TABATABAEI A., SAMIMI M.. EVALUATION OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REFERRED TO THE IRAN MEDICAL COUNCIL DURING YEARS 2003 TO 2008. BINA[Internet]. 2012;17(4 (69)):374-379. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42783/en

IEEE: Copy

M.R. MANSOURI, A. TABATABAEI, and M. SAMIMI, “EVALUATION OF MALPRACTICE CLAIMS AGAINST OPHTHALMOLOGISTS REFERRED TO THE IRAN MEDICAL COUNCIL DURING YEARS 2003 TO 2008,” BINA, vol. 17, no. 4 (69), pp. 374–379, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42783/en

Related Journal Papers