THE PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARPENTER-COUSTAN AND NDDG

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GARSHASPI E.; ABBASIAN M.; FALAH NADER; KHOSHNIAT NIKOO S.M.; RAJABI POUR B.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism Year:2004 | Volume:4 | Issue:1 Page(s): 43-50

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,062

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARPENTER-COUSTAN AND NDDG

Author(s)

Keywords

GESTATINAL DIABETES MELLITUSQ2

CARPENTER COUSTANQ4

NDDGQ4

PREVALENCEQ4

Abstract

Background: Currently different criteria are used to diagnose Gestational Diabetes. ACOG (American college of obstetric and Gynecology) accepted NDDGs (criteria National Diabetes Data Group) Criteria and ADA (American Diabetes Association) accepted Carpenter Caustan's. Although both of these criteria have been achieved by O Salivan and Mahan's reaserches, the number of patients has been diagnosed are different .The aim of this study was to compare Gestational Diabetes PREVALENCE according to Carpenter Caustan's and NDDG's Criteria. Methods: 1200 pregnant women were screened in a prenatal care clinic. Patients with definite diabetes were excluded. According to universal GDM screening method, for all of the patients GCT and GTT (if GCT > 130) were preformed. The results evaluated according to Carpenter Caustan's and NDDG's criteria. Results: In this screening, 377 participants had positive GCT, according to Carpenter and Caustan's criteria 83 women (6.9%), and according to NDDG criteria 50 women (3.6%) had Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. If the cut of point of GCT was 140 mg/dl instead of 130 mg/dl, according to Carpenter and Caustan's criteria 16 women (18.1%), and according to NDDG 4 patients (9%) were missed. Conclusion: Regarding the significant difference between two methods in diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, assessment of each method value in improving prognosis and outcomes is necessary. According to the results the cut of point of 130 mg/dl, as recommended in previous studies, has more accuracy for screening.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

GARSHASPI, E., ABBASIAN, M., FALAH, NADER, KHOSHNIAT NIKOO, S.M., & RAJABI POUR, B.. (2004). THE PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARPENTER-COUSTAN AND NDDG. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 4(1), 43-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/53964/en

Vancouver: Copy

GARSHASPI E., ABBASIAN M., FALAH NADER, KHOSHNIAT NIKOO S.M., RAJABI POUR B.. THE PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARPENTER-COUSTAN AND NDDG. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS[Internet]. 2004;4(1):43-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/53964/en

IEEE: Copy

E. GARSHASPI, M. ABBASIAN, NADER FALAH, S.M. KHOSHNIAT NIKOO, and B. RAJABI POUR, “THE PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARPENTER-COUSTAN AND NDDG,” JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/53964/en

Related Journal Papers