A COMPARISON OF 0.25% PETHIDINE VERSUS 0.5% LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (IVRA) FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

IMANI F.; JAFARIAN ALI AKBAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,086

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF 0.25% PETHIDINE VERSUS 0.5% LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (IVRA) FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY

Author(s)

IMANI F. | JAFARIAN ALI AKBAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PETHIDINEQ3

LIDOCAINEQ3

INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIAQ3

Abstract

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is a technique for providing anesthesia during extremity surgery. LIDOCAINE is one of local anesthetics which commonly used for IVRA. PETHIDINE (meperidine) has been shown to have weak local anesthetic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether PETHIDINE alone, compared to lid6caine, produce sufficient anesthesia during INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA.50 ASA I-II adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for upper extremity received IVRA under double tourniquet condition with either PETHIDINE or LIDOCAINE. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: P group received 40ml and L group received 40ml 0.5% LIDOCAINE. Onset of sensory and motor block, sensory and motor block recovery times, pain score after tourniquet released, total midazolam and sufentanil doses during surgery and recovery room, and incidnece of adverse effects were recorded.Onset of sensory and motor block in P group was slower than L group. Sensory block recovery time was more prolonged in P than L group, but not significant difference in motor block recovery time. Average doses of sufentanil and midazolam administrated during surgery in P and L groups were no significant differences, but sufentanil administrated during recovery room was lower in P than L group. Pain score at first 30 min after tourniquet released in P group was lower than L group. Some side effects was more in P group and some was more in L group.Our study showed that the PETHIDINE as sole anesthetic in IVRA can not be first choice drug, but when LIDOCAINE be contraindicated, PETHIDINE can be alternative drug and produce acceptable anesthetic condition.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

IMANI, F., & JAFARIAN, ALI AKBAR. (2004). A COMPARISON OF 0.25% PETHIDINE VERSUS 0.5% LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (IVRA) FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 25(45), 17-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63279/en

Vancouver: Copy

IMANI F., JAFARIAN ALI AKBAR. A COMPARISON OF 0.25% PETHIDINE VERSUS 0.5% LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (IVRA) FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2004;25(45):17-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63279/en

IEEE: Copy

F. IMANI, and ALI AKBAR JAFARIAN, “A COMPARISON OF 0.25% PETHIDINE VERSUS 0.5% LIDOCAINE IN INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (IVRA) FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 25, no. 45, pp. 17–25, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63279/en

Related Journal Papers