مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,208
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THESURVEY OF RESULTS OF SUPRACONDYLARFRACTURES SURGERY OF DISTALL HUMERUS INFANTS.

Pages

  70-75

Abstract

 New Page 1 Introduction & objectives: Supracondylar Fractures of the distal humerus often instill a sense of apprehension in the surgeons and the patients due to post treatment complications and limitation of motion in elbow joint and deformity . There are two operation approaches as anterior and posterior, however the anterior (Anteromedial) approach is probably the one most commonly used. More to survey the approaches. Then this reseach is being done to survey and compare the results of superacondylar fractures surgery of distal humerus by this two approaches. Methodology: This research is a descriptive - analytical one and prospective being, done on 82 patients with having supracondylar fracture of the humerus has operated (36 cases anterior approach, 46 cases posterior approach) in 1379-81years. Results: These results were obtained: Anterior approach: - Deformity: 4 cases (11/1%) - Range of motion (Gruber &Healy score) : 16 cases (44/6%) excelent, 11 cases ( 30/5%) good, 6 cases (16/6%) intermediate, 3 cases ( 8/3%) bad Posterior approach: - Deformity: 1 case (2/2%) - Range of motion (Gruber & Healy score) 23 cases (50%) excelent, 14 cases ( 30/4%) good, 7 cases (15/2%) intermediate, 2 cases ( 4/4%) bad Infection, myositis ossificant and neurovascular complications were not seen in both Surgical approaches. Conclusion: The posterior approach is advocated because: - It is a simple method. - Exposure of fracture site is easy. - It does not tranverse in proximity to any vital structures. In the supracondylar fractures with neurovascular injury the anterior approach isprefered .

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHAYEM HASANKHANI, E., REZVANI, H., BAGERI, F., REZVANI, B., & REZVANI, N.. (2003). THESURVEY OF RESULTS OF SUPRACONDYLARFRACTURES SURGERY OF DISTALL HUMERUS INFANTS.. OFOGH-E-DANESH, 9(1), 70-75. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68782/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHAYEM HASANKHANI E., REZVANI H., BAGERI F., REZVANI B., REZVANI N.. THESURVEY OF RESULTS OF SUPRACONDYLARFRACTURES SURGERY OF DISTALL HUMERUS INFANTS.. OFOGH-E-DANESH[Internet]. 2003;9(1):70-75. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68782/en

    IEEE: Copy

    E. GHAYEM HASANKHANI, H. REZVANI, F. BAGERI, B. REZVANI, and N. REZVANI, “THESURVEY OF RESULTS OF SUPRACONDYLARFRACTURES SURGERY OF DISTALL HUMERUS INFANTS.,” OFOGH-E-DANESH, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68782/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top