Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

109
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

65
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Multiple Choice Questions with Diff erent Numbers of Options in University Putra Malaysia Undergraduate Medical Program: A Comparative Analysis in 2017 and 2018

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) are used for measuring the student’ s progress, and they should be analyzed properly to guarantee the item’ s appropriateness. The analysis usually determines three indices of an item; diffi culty or passing index (PI), Discrimination Index (DI), and distractor effi ciency (DE). Objectives: This study was aimed to analyze the Multiple-Choice Questions in the preclinical and clinical examinations with diff erent numbers of options in medical program of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Forty Multiple-Choice Questions with four options from the preclinical examination and 80 Multiple-Choice Questions with fi ve options from the clinical examination in 2017 and 2018 were analyzed using optical mark recognition machine and Ms. Excel. The parameters included PI, DI, and DE. Results: The average diffi culty level of Multiple-Choice Questions for preclinical and clinical phase examinations were similar in 2017 and 2018 that were considered ‘ acceptable’ and ‘ ideal’ ranged from 0. 55 to 0. 60, respectively. The average DIs were similar in all examinations that were considered ‘ good’ (ranged from 0. 25 to 0. 31) except in 2018 clinical phase examination that showed ‘ poor’ items (DI = 0. 20 0. 11). The questions for preclinical phase showed an increase in the number of ‘ excellent’ and ‘ good’ items in 2018 from 37. 5% to 70. 0%. There was an increase of 10. 0% for preclinical phase, and 6. 25% for clinical phase, in the number of items with no non-functioning distractors in 2018. Among all, preclinical Multiple-Choice Questions in 2018 showed the highest mean of DE (71. 67%). Conclusions: Our fi ndings suggested that there was an improvement in the questions from preclinical phase while more training on questions preparation and continuous feedback should be given to clinical phase teachers. A higher number of options did not aff ect the level of diffi culty of a question; however, the discrimination power and distractors effi ciency might diff er.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Adam, Siti Khadijah, Idris, Faridah, Jahn Kassim, Puteri Shanaz, Zakaria, Nor Fadhlina, & Hod, Rafidah. (2021). Multiple Choice Questions with Diff erent Numbers of Options in University Putra Malaysia Undergraduate Medical Program: A Comparative Analysis in 2017 and 2018. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 20(2), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/698396/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Adam Siti Khadijah, Idris Faridah, Jahn Kassim Puteri Shanaz, Zakaria Nor Fadhlina, Hod Rafidah. Multiple Choice Questions with Diff erent Numbers of Options in University Putra Malaysia Undergraduate Medical Program: A Comparative Analysis in 2017 and 2018. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2021;20(2):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/698396/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Siti Khadijah Adam, Faridah Idris, Puteri Shanaz Jahn Kassim, Nor Fadhlina Zakaria, and Rafidah Hod, “Multiple Choice Questions with Diff erent Numbers of Options in University Putra Malaysia Undergraduate Medical Program: A Comparative Analysis in 2017 and 2018,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 0–0, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/698396/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top