مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

134
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

128
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Impact Measurement on Medical Faculty for Adhering to Appropriate Guidelines in Framing Eff ective Multiple-Choice Questions for Item Analysis

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are the most frequently accepted tool for the evaluation of comprehension, knowledge, and application among medical students. In single best response MCQs (items), a high order of cognition of students can be assessed. It is essential to develop valid and reliable MCQs, as fl awed items will interfere with the unbiased assessment. The present paper gives an attempt to discuss the art of framing well-structured items taking kind help from the provided references. This article puts forth a practice for committed medical educators to uplift the skill of forming quality MCQs by enhanced Faculty Development programs (FDPs). Objectives: The objective of the study is also to test the quality of MCQs by Item Analysis. Methods: In this study, 100 MCQs of set I or set II were distributed to 200 MBBS students of Late Shri Lakhiram Agrawal Memorial Govt. Medical College Raigarh (CG) for Item Analysis for quality MCQs. Set I and Set II were MCQs which were formed by 60 medical faculty before and after FDP, respectively. All MCQs had a single stem with three wrong and one correct answers. The data were entered in Microsoft excel 2016 software to analyze. The diffi culty index (Dif I), Discrimination Index (DI), and distractor effi ciency (DE) were the Item Analysis parameters used to evaluate the impact on adhering to the guidelines for framing MCQs. Results: The mean calculated diffi culty index, Discrimination Index, and distractor effi ciency were 56. 54%, 0. 26, and 89. 93%, respectively. Among 100 items, 14 items were of higher diffi culty level (DIF I < 30%), 70 were of moderate category, and 16 items were of easy level (DIF I > 60%). A total of 10 items had very good DI (0. 40), 32 had recommended values (0. 30-0. 39), and 25 were acceptable with changes (0. 20-0. 29). Of the 100 MCQs, there were 27 MCQs with DE of 66. 66% and 11 MCQs with DE of 33. 33%. Conclusions: In this study, higher cognitive-domain MCQs increased after training, recurrent-type MCQ decreased, and MCQ with item writing fl aws reduced, therefore making our results much more statistically signifi cant. We had nine MCQs that satisfi ed all the criteria of Item Analysis.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Kundu, Surajit, Ughade, Jaideo M., Sherke, Anil R., Kanwar, Yogita, Tiwari, Samta, Jatwar, Ravikant, Gurudiwan, Richa, & Kundu, Sumati G.. (2020). Impact Measurement on Medical Faculty for Adhering to Appropriate Guidelines in Framing Eff ective Multiple-Choice Questions for Item Analysis. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 19(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/745241/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Kundu Surajit, Ughade Jaideo M., Sherke Anil R., Kanwar Yogita, Tiwari Samta, Jatwar Ravikant, Gurudiwan Richa, Kundu Sumati G.. Impact Measurement on Medical Faculty for Adhering to Appropriate Guidelines in Framing Eff ective Multiple-Choice Questions for Item Analysis. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2020;19(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/745241/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Surajit Kundu, Jaideo M. Ughade, Anil R. Sherke, Yogita Kanwar, Samta Tiwari, Ravikant Jatwar, Richa Gurudiwan, and Sumati G. Kundu, “Impact Measurement on Medical Faculty for Adhering to Appropriate Guidelines in Framing Eff ective Multiple-Choice Questions for Item Analysis,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/745241/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button