مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

127
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

128
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine for third molar surgery

Pages

  26-33

Abstract

 Background: This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy, postoperative pain, hemorrhage & dry sock incidence of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in inferior alveolar nerve block during impacted lower third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted on 20 subjects planned for elective surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular with similar difficulty indices. A single operator performed all surgeries on basis using 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine as an anesthetic agent and with the same concentration of vasoconstrictor (epinephrine 1: 100, 1000). Latency, duration of anesthetic effect, intra and post surgical pain experiences, hemorrhage & dry socket occurrences were evaluated with respect to the type of anesthetia. A visual analog scale was used to score pain. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, repeated measures ANOVA, Wilcoxon and McNemar’ s test (α =0. 05). Results: Latency, Intra & Postoperative pain and hemorrhage showed clinical differences in favor of articaine, though statistical significance was not reached. In turn, the mean duration of anesthetic for articain was much extended and showed statistically significant difference. Dry socket incidence consisted of two occurrences (5%) and those two only occurred in Lidocain group. Conclusion: Although 4% articaine offers better pharmacological performance than 2% lidocaine, both articaine and lidocaine have demonstrated adequate, negligible differences and acceptable clinical profiles. For this reason, their use in oral surgery should remain of the professional preference who will evaluate their use base on the necessary surgical time.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHAHNASERI, SHIRIN, MOHAMMADI, NAVID, Tamizifar, Alireza, & MOUSAVI, SEYED AMIR. (2019). Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine for third molar surgery. JOURNAL OF CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 6(1), 26-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/767273/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHAHNASERI SHIRIN, MOHAMMADI NAVID, Tamizifar Alireza, MOUSAVI SEYED AMIR. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine for third molar surgery. JOURNAL OF CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;6(1):26-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/767273/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHIRIN SHAHNASERI, NAVID MOHAMMADI, Alireza Tamizifar, and SEYED AMIR MOUSAVI, “Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine for third molar surgery,” JOURNAL OF CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/767273/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button