COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JABALAMELI MITRA; ARAM SHAHNAZ; SHAHBAZI MASOOD; PARVARESH MARYAM; TAHERI SHARAREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Year:2011 | Volume:13 | Issue:6 Page(s): 8-12

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

989

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION

Author(s)

Keywords

PETHIDINEQ3

POSTOPERATIVE PAINQ3

CESAREANQ3

Abstract

Background: Intranasal route administration of opioid drugs has been shown to be an alternative treatment method without major side effects. In this study we evaluated the intranasal (IN) versus intravenous (IV) PETHIDINE for POSTOPERATIVE PAIN relief after CESAREAN section.Materials and Method: In this clinical trial, 126 women undergoing elective CESAREAN section with general anesthesia using thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg, succynylcholine 1.5 mg /kg, then O2/N2O with 50/50 ratio, halothane 0.5 MAC, atracurium 0.2 mg /kg and fentanyl were entered into the study. Parturients were randomized in to two groups receiving IN PETHIDINE (1mg/kg, n=63) or IV PETHIDINE (1mg/kg, n=63) in recovery room. Pain intensity, incidence of nausea and vomiting and systolic blood pressure were recorded after PETHIDINE administration and then every half an hour for 4 hours.Data analyzed with independent student t-test using SPSS software.Results: The mean visual analogue scale score in IV group was less than IN group at first two hours after PETHIDINE administration.No significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting was found between two groups. There was a significant decrease in mean systolic blood pressure in IV group compared with IN group at all the times (P<0.05).Conclusion: Although, IN PETHIDINE was less effective on post CESAREAN pain relief, it seems to be an interesting alternative route for those who had no intravenous access, or had an allergy to morphine and unabale oral intake.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JABALAMELI, MITRA, ARAM, SHAHNAZ, SHAHBAZI, MASOOD, PARVARESH, MARYAM, & TAHERI, SHARAREH. (2011). COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH), 13(6), 8-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/84497/en

Vancouver: Copy

JABALAMELI MITRA, ARAM SHAHNAZ, SHAHBAZI MASOOD, PARVARESH MARYAM, TAHERI SHARAREH. COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH)[Internet]. 2011;13(6):8-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/84497/en

IEEE: Copy

MITRA JABALAMELI, SHAHNAZ ARAM, MASOOD SHAHBAZI, MARYAM PARVARESH, and SHARAREH TAHERI, “COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION,” ZAHEDAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (TABIB-E-SHARGH), vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 8–12, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/84497/en

Related Journal Papers