COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBCUTICULAR AND INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL WOUND REPAIR ON WOUND INFECTION AFTER SUPPURATIVE APPENDECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAAFARI GIV SH.; ABD ALRAHIM KASHI E.; GHANI H.; MOUSAVI SEYED GHOLAM ABAS; AFSHAR M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences Year:2006 | Volume:12 | Issue:3-4 (24-25) Page(s): 41-44

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

903

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBCUTICULAR AND INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL WOUND REPAIR ON WOUND INFECTION AFTER SUPPURATIVE APPENDECTOMY

Author(s)

Keywords

APPENDICITIS (SUPPURATIVE PHASE)Q4

SUBCUTICULAR REPAIRQ3

INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMALQ3

SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONQ4

SUTUREQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Different methods for appendectomy operation wound repairs have been applied. The two common methods of the wound repair in suppurative phase of appendicitis are subcuticular and interrupted wound repair. There have been controversies on the benefit of each method. This Study was designed to compare the two methods of appendectomy wound repair on wound infection after suppurative appendectomy.Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients who had necessary conditions for participating in survey were divided randomly into 2 groups in 2003. In the first group, operational wounds were repaired by subcuticular method and in the second by INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL technique. Then the patients in the two groups were visited by another surgeon unaware of the type of suturation at intervals of one week and one month after operation. The results on the rate and kind of wound infection, pus secretion, wound opening and systemic infections were compared by SPSS software using Chi-Square and fisher exact tests. P<0.05 was considered as the significant level.Results: The mean age of patients in INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL and subcuticular groups were 20.85±6.7 and 20.61±6.58 yrs (P=0.8), respectively. Sexes of the two groups were also similar with male dominating of 54% and 53% in transdermal and subcuticular groups, respectively (P=0.89). Local infection rates in subcuticular and transdermal group one week after surgeries were 9% and 6%, respectively (P=0.421). Rates of pus secretion and wound opening one week after surgery in subcuticular and transdermal group, were 5% and 4% respectively (P=0.99). No Systemic infection was found one week and one month after operation in both groups.Conclusion: Sine there were no statistical significant differences between the two methods of subcuticular and INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL wound repair in supportive appendectomy either of them could be used.

Cites

نگاهی نو به مساله ای قدیمی: مقایسه عوارض زخم در دو روش Subcuticular و Interrupted در آپاندکتومی های بدون عارضه

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAAFARI GIV, SH., ABD ALRAHIM KASHI, E., GHANI, H., MOUSAVI, SEYED GHOLAM ABAS, & AFSHAR, M.. (2006). COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBCUTICULAR AND INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL WOUND REPAIR ON WOUND INFECTION AFTER SUPPURATIVE APPENDECTOMY. JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 12(3-4 (24-25)), 41-44. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/95557/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAAFARI GIV SH., ABD ALRAHIM KASHI E., GHANI H., MOUSAVI SEYED GHOLAM ABAS, AFSHAR M.. COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBCUTICULAR AND INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL WOUND REPAIR ON WOUND INFECTION AFTER SUPPURATIVE APPENDECTOMY. JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2006;12(3-4 (24-25)):41-44. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/95557/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. JAAFARI GIV, E. ABD ALRAHIM KASHI, H. GHANI, SEYED GHOLAM ABAS MOUSAVI, and M. AFSHAR, “COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBCUTICULAR AND INTERRUPTED TRANSDERMAL WOUND REPAIR ON WOUND INFECTION AFTER SUPPURATIVE APPENDECTOMY,” JOURNAL OF BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 12, no. 3-4 (24-25), pp. 41–44, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/95557/en

Related Journal Papers