COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC & CLINICAL METHODS IN FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MEHDIZADEH A.; CHAICHIAN SH.; HOURSAN H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY Year:2004 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 Page(s): 49-53

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

934

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC & CLINICAL METHODS IN FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION

Author(s)

MEHDIZADEH A. | CHAICHIAN SH. | HOURSAN H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICAL ESTIMATIONQ4

ULTRASOUND ESTIMATIONQ4

FETAL WEIGHTQ4

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed for evaluation of accuracy of FETAL WEIGHT estimation by clinical & ultrasonographic methods in Iranian population .Meterial & Method:This prospective study was conducted on two hundred preg .nant mothers that reffered to obstetric department during years 1378 & 1379 . Findings:Our study showed that there was statistically significant difference between clinical estimate of FETAL WEIGHT and actual birth weight , as well as between ULTRASOUND ESTIMATION and actual birth weight. The mean error of CLINICAL ESTIMATION was 101g ,or 32g/kg, for a 3.2% error. The error of ultrasound in the same population was 141g, or 45g/kg, for a 4.5% error. Analysis of these data revealed statistically significant difference between the mean error of CLINICAL ESTIMATION and ULTRASOUND ESTIMATION of FETAL WEIGHT. Conclusion:Our study indicates that the mean clinical estimate of FETAL WEIGHT is more accurate than ultrasound for the estimation of FETAL WEIGHT in our population. This has important implications for developoing countries where , there is a lack of technologically advanced ultrasound machines capable of performing sophisticated functions like FETAL WEIGHT estimation.

Cites

مقایسه تخمین وزن جنین با روش بالینی، سونوگرافی و فرمول ترکیبی از سونوگرافی و وزن مادر

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MEHDIZADEH, A., CHAICHIAN, SH., & HOURSAN, H.. (2004). COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC & CLINICAL METHODS IN FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION. MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, 14(1), 49-53. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98590/en

Vancouver: Copy

MEHDIZADEH A., CHAICHIAN SH., HOURSAN H.. COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC & CLINICAL METHODS IN FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION. MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2004;14(1):49-53. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98590/en

IEEE: Copy

A. MEHDIZADEH, SH. CHAICHIAN, and H. HOURSAN, “COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC & CLINICAL METHODS IN FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION,” MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98590/en

Related Journal Papers