Vaginitis is the most common gynecological diseases. Due to its known side effects of leaving untreated or mistreated and also with respect to controversies in its diagnosis, this study has been conducted on symptomatic women referring to Taleghani Hospital in 1999, to determine the efficacy of rapid clinical and laboratory diagnosis including wet smear, direct smear and Amsel criteria, in diagnosis of different types of vaginitis (candidiasis, trichomonasis and bacterial). This study of clinical type, performed on 106 patients with vaginitis. First of all, clinical diagnosis based on signs, symptoms, observations and physical exams has been made and then sampling of vaginal secretion to study vaginal PH, whiff test, wet smear, direct smear, and culture has been achieved. Vaginitis was confirmed in 23% (24 patients) based on culture, and in 71 % (76 patients) based on physical examinations (without microscopic studies or culture) (p<0.0001). The specificity and sensitivity of clinical diagnosis were 79% and 31%, where positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 26% and 83%, respectively. We believe that conventional methods of diagnosis, based on clinical manifestation, are not reliable in definite diagnosis, as a matter of fact it just brings the suspicion of disease.