مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,237
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

METHODES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT

Pages

  1-18

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Specific language impiarment (SLI) is one of the most prevalent developmental language disorders its DIAGNOSIS is a problematic issue among researchers and clinicians because of the heterogeneity of language profiles in the affected population and overlapping with other developmental language disorders. The aim of this study was to review the suggested diagnostic criteria for this disorder, controversies about these criteria and identify the most accurate diagnostic methods.Methods: Published article from 1980 to 2012 in bibliographic and publisher databases including Pubmed, Google scholar, Cochran library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Springer, Oxford, Science direct, Ovid, Iran Medex and Magiran about the diagnostic methods for discriminating preschoool children with specific language impiarment from normal developing children were reviewd in this article. These keywords were used for research: “SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT”, “SLI”, “diagnosis or IDENTIFICATION”, “standardized tests”, and “tests for language development”.Conclusion: The results of this study show inspite of agreement of researchers and clinicians about exclusionary criteria as one basic part of the DIAGNOSIS of specific language impiarment, there is no consensus about the other part, inclusionary criteria. Different studies used different inclusionary criteria which can be divided to categories of clincal judgment, discrepancy-based criteria, standardized testing, CLINICAL MARKERS and markers from spontaneous speech samples. Advantages, disadvantages, and clinical applicability of each diagnostic method are discussed in this article.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MALEKI SHAHMAHMOOD, TOKTAM, NAKHOSTIN ANSARI, NOUREDDIN, & SOLEIMANI, ZAHRA. (2014). METHODES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 23(2), 1-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106341/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MALEKI SHAHMAHMOOD TOKTAM, NAKHOSTIN ANSARI NOUREDDIN, SOLEIMANI ZAHRA. METHODES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH[Internet]. 2014;23(2):1-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106341/en

    IEEE: Copy

    TOKTAM MALEKI SHAHMAHMOOD, NOUREDDIN NAKHOSTIN ANSARI, and ZAHRA SOLEIMANI, “METHODES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT,” AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106341/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top