THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE CURRENT VIEWS ON CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION: BASED ON THE RICHARD PAUL, ROBERT ENNIS AND BERTRAND RUSSELL’ S POINT OF VIEW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VEJDANI FATEMEH; SAJADI SEYED MAHDI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES Year:2014 | Volume:11 | Issue:15 (42) Page(s): 12-23

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,169

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE CURRENT VIEWS ON CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION: BASED ON THE RICHARD PAUL, ROBERT ENNIS AND BERTRAND RUSSELL’ S POINT OF VIEW

Author(s)

VEJDANI FATEMEH | SAJADI SEYED MAHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRITICAL THINKINGQ2

RICHARD PAULQ2

BERTRAND RUSSELLQ2

ROBERT ENNISQ2

Abstract

CRITICAL THINKING is an important part of education and should be considered in all parts of curriculum in all levels. The essence and the nature of CRITICAL THINKING, its chief principals and its reinforcing plans are what going to be studied in this essay, using a descriptive-analytical and comparative method. The results show that these three approaches toward CRITICAL THINKING are not in the same way, especially Russell’s viewpoint which is more different. Specifically, CRITICAL THINKING has been discussed by Paul and Ennis, and both have purposed exact plans for its practicality and integrating it to the educational curriculum. Their approach, also, have a lot in common with psychological approach, too. But Russell’s viewpoint is of theoretical and philosophical one. He explained and justified CRITICAL THINKING from a humanistic viewpoint. Regardless of these differences, applying CRITICAL THINKING both in believes and actions of the teachers is the vary point with which they are, all, agreed. They believe that these points not only should be thought but also should be put into practice.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

VEJDANI, FATEMEH, & SAJADI, SEYED MAHDI. (2014). THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE CURRENT VIEWS ON CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION: BASED ON THE RICHARD PAUL, ROBERT ENNIS AND BERTRAND RUSSELL’ S POINT OF VIEW. CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 11(15 (42)), 12-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/127231/en

Vancouver: Copy

VEJDANI FATEMEH, SAJADI SEYED MAHDI. THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE CURRENT VIEWS ON CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION: BASED ON THE RICHARD PAUL, ROBERT ENNIS AND BERTRAND RUSSELL’ S POINT OF VIEW. CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2014;11(15 (42)):12-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/127231/en

IEEE: Copy

FATEMEH VEJDANI, and SEYED MAHDI SAJADI, “THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE CURRENT VIEWS ON CRITICAL THINKING AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATION: BASED ON THE RICHARD PAUL, ROBERT ENNIS AND BERTRAND RUSSELL’ S POINT OF VIEW,” CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 15 (42), pp. 12–23, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/127231/en

Related Journal Papers