COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THREE TONOMETER; PULSAIR EASY EYE, TONOPEN AND GOLDMANN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SORKHABI R.; KHATIBIAN P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine Year:2010 | Volume:16 | Issue:4 (SN 54) Page(s): 20-25

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,944

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THREE TONOMETER; PULSAIR EASY EYE, TONOPEN AND GOLDMANN

Author(s)

SORKHABI R. | KHATIBIAN P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTRAOCULAR PRESSUREQ3

GOLDMANNQ3

PULSAIR EASY EYEQ3

TONOPENQ3

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: The measurement of INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) is very important not only in the diagnosis and management of glaucomatous conditions but also in any ophthalmologic examination. So this study was designed to compare the results of noncontact pulsair and tononpen tonometry with GOLDMANN known as gold standard method. Materials & Methods: In this cross sectional study on 150 patients after a complete ophthalmic examination; tonometry was performed with GOLDMANN (G), pulsair (P) and TONOPEN (T). Mean values obtained from the three methods and the difference between the first two methods and G were measured and with descriptive statistical methods, t tests and regression tests were analyzed.Results: Mean measured IOP with P was greater than G and T (P=0.03). Correlation coefficient between the 3 methods was acceptable (r2=0.71). Mean difference between P and G does not differs significantly from 0 (P=0.19), but this value between T and G differs significantly from 0 (P=0.02). Both T and P underestimate IOP in high ranges.Conclusion: Both T and P tonometry measures have acceptable accuracy in comparison with G, but in suspicious cases such as glaucoma or ocular hypertension G is better as a gold standard method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SORKHABI, R., & KHATIBIAN, P.. (2010). COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THREE TONOMETER; PULSAIR EASY EYE, TONOPEN AND GOLDMANN. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), 16(4 (SN 54)), 20-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/17819/en

Vancouver: Copy

SORKHABI R., KHATIBIAN P.. COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THREE TONOMETER; PULSAIR EASY EYE, TONOPEN AND GOLDMANN. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES)[Internet]. 2010;16(4 (SN 54)):20-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/17819/en

IEEE: Copy

R. SORKHABI, and P. KHATIBIAN, “COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THREE TONOMETER; PULSAIR EASY EYE, TONOPEN AND GOLDMANN,” AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), vol. 16, no. 4 (SN 54), pp. 20–25, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/17819/en

Related Journal Papers