مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

741
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS FOR E-LEARNING ETHICS

Pages

  104-121

Abstract

 Although e-learning provides abilities and potential facilities to develop the scientific and educational boundaries, but likely how these changes and developments affect the boundaries, it' snot explicit for us. So, the ambiguities lead to appear pervasive social and ethical problems and issues around the technological artifact. Attention to the relation between e-learning and society (as a target population) is very important to achieve new conceptualization related to the E-LEARNING ETHICS. Therefore, to explain the normative relation between e-learning and society, it could suggest some proper conceptual frameworks for the E-LEARNING ETHICS, so that the suggestion is main goal of the E-LEARNING ETHICS. In this article, in order to define and analytic study of alternative conceptual frameworks in the E-LEARNING ETHICS based on two philosophical approaches, namely technological determinism and social construction of technology, Jefferies-Stahl-McRobb analytical model provides the analytic comparison ground. According to the philosophical approaches, finally, after analyzing nature of E-LEARNING ETHICS, these are achieved alternative definitions of E-LEARNING ETHICS based on the trilogy model of PEDAGOGY, information ethics, and ethics.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SEGHATOLESLAMI, ALIREZA. (2016). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS FOR E-LEARNING ETHICS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 1(1-2), 104-121. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/262672/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SEGHATOLESLAMI ALIREZA. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS FOR E-LEARNING ETHICS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2016;1(1-2):104-121. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/262672/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA SEGHATOLESLAMI, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS FOR E-LEARNING ETHICS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 104–121, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/262672/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button