مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,230
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative content analysis of the Biology book of eleventh year of high school and the Natural Sciences book of American high Schools based on Guilford› s creativity

Pages

  72-82

Abstract

 One of the most important educational goals in developed countries is boom and creativity. Education as the most important educational institution with the production of creative content can be very influential in this regard. The research method is a Content analysis using the Guilford Creativity and it is Applied. The statistical population consists of the content of the Biology book of eleventh year of high school and the book of natural sciences in high schools of the United States. In the first step, questions, pictures, activities and text of books were identified and coded. In the second phase, all units in all sections with the class were matched in terms of Guilford› s creativity indices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. In the content of the motion section of the Biology book of eleventh year, attention is not paid to the levels of cognitive memory and convergent thinking, Depending on the level of creativity of Guilford. But attention has been paid to other levels, including divergent thinking and evaluation thinking. While the text of the book of natural sciences in high schools in the United States has focused on levels of cognitive memory and convergent thinking, But, the other levels, including divergent thinking and evaluative thinking, there has not been much attention. Thus, the Biology book of eleventh year has paid more attention to The Guilford› s creativity components than the school› s natural science book.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Pordeli, Mostafa, Rabiee, Mohammad Reza, & Zeinal Zade, Mohammad Reza. (2019). Comparative content analysis of the Biology book of eleventh year of high school and the Natural Sciences book of American high Schools based on Guilford› s creativity. RESEARCH IN BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 1(1 ), 72-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/269424/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Pordeli Mostafa, Rabiee Mohammad Reza, Zeinal Zade Mohammad Reza. Comparative content analysis of the Biology book of eleventh year of high school and the Natural Sciences book of American high Schools based on Guilford› s creativity. RESEARCH IN BIOLOGY EDUCATION[Internet]. 2019;1(1 ):72-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/269424/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mostafa Pordeli, Mohammad Reza Rabiee, and Mohammad Reza Zeinal Zade, “Comparative content analysis of the Biology book of eleventh year of high school and the Natural Sciences book of American high Schools based on Guilford› s creativity,” RESEARCH IN BIOLOGY EDUCATION, vol. 1, no. 1 , pp. 72–82, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/269424/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top