EXAMINATION THE MAGILL AND HALL (1990) HYPOTHESIS ABOUT CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN MALES AND FEMALES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ROUHOLLAHI R.; FAROKHI A.; SABERI KAKHKI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: OLYMPIC Year:2006 | Volume:13 | Issue:4 (SERIAL 32) Page(s): 7-20

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,312

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EXAMINATION THE MAGILL AND HALL (1990) HYPOTHESIS ABOUT CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN MALES AND FEMALES

Author(s)

ROUHOLLAHI R. | FAROKHI A. | SABERI KAKHKI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MOTOR LEARNINGQ2

CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCEQ3

GENERALIZED MOTOR PROGRAMQ3

TIME PARAMETERQ4

Abstract

This study examined the Magill and Hall (1990) hypothesis about CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE in males and females. The participants (N=60) were divided with regard to gender differences (N =30 males, N =30 females) and two practice conditions (Blocked, Random) randomly. They performed a sequential timing task. The experiment had three phases: (1) acquisition, (2) delay retention and (3) delay transfer. Data were analyzed by ANOVA with repeated measures on the block of practice. The results showed that the blocked practice was better than random practice in females for GENERALIZED MOTOR PROGRAM learning. However, for males the finding was reversed. Probably, the cause of different results may be concerned how information was processed and so spatial working memory capacity and spatial working memory size. Also, the results showed that there is no significance differences in parameterization component between groups. Therefore, the findings supported Magill and Hall (1990) hypothesis.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ROUHOLLAHI, R., FAROKHI, A., & SABERI KAKHKI, A.. (2006). EXAMINATION THE MAGILL AND HALL (1990) HYPOTHESIS ABOUT CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN MALES AND FEMALES. OLYMPIC, 13(4 (SERIAL 32)), 7-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/37892/en

Vancouver: Copy

ROUHOLLAHI R., FAROKHI A., SABERI KAKHKI A.. EXAMINATION THE MAGILL AND HALL (1990) HYPOTHESIS ABOUT CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN MALES AND FEMALES. OLYMPIC[Internet]. 2006;13(4 (SERIAL 32)):7-20. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/37892/en

IEEE: Copy

R. ROUHOLLAHI, A. FAROKHI, and A. SABERI KAKHKI, “EXAMINATION THE MAGILL AND HALL (1990) HYPOTHESIS ABOUT CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN MALES AND FEMALES,” OLYMPIC, vol. 13, no. 4 (SERIAL 32), pp. 7–20, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/37892/en

Related Journal Papers