مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

297
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Trend of Faculty Member’ s Evaluation Scores by Students in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2016

Pages

  155-161

Abstract

 Background and purpose: Assessing and improving the quality and educational capability of faculty members in universities is to improve the quality of programs, making appropriate policies and performing better educational activities. faculty member’ s evaluation by students is an important tool for both the lecturers and educational managers in educational planning. The aim of this study was to assess the trend of faculty member’ s evaluation scores by students in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2016. Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in faculty members in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences selected via census sampling. We used the scores for faculty members using the electronic educational management system (SAMA). It allows all students to evaluate university lecturers before final exams in every semester using a checklist. Data analysis was done applying descriptive and inferential tests in SPSS V22. Results: The evaluation scores for faculty members (2012-2016) were evaluated. The scores ranged between 4. 25± 0. 4 and 4. 49± 0. 3. The mean evaluation scores showed significant changes whithin the years studied (P<0. 001). Conclusion: The average scores for evaluation of faculty members changed significantly during this period. Usually the accuracy of information collected from students is questioned, therefore, further studies with quantitative-qualitative approach are recommended.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MAHMOODI, ELAHE, AMUEI, FATTANE, REZAI, MOHAMMAD SADEGH, MORADI, SIAVASH, & Sadeghi mahalli, Forouzan. (2019). Trend of Faculty Member’ s Evaluation Scores by Students in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2016. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 29(175 ), 155-161. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/406062/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MAHMOODI ELAHE, AMUEI FATTANE, REZAI MOHAMMAD SADEGH, MORADI SIAVASH, Sadeghi mahalli Forouzan. Trend of Faculty Member’ s Evaluation Scores by Students in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2016. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2019;29(175 ):155-161. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/406062/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ELAHE MAHMOODI, FATTANE AMUEI, MOHAMMAD SADEGH REZAI, SIAVASH MORADI, and Forouzan Sadeghi mahalli, “Trend of Faculty Member’ s Evaluation Scores by Students in Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-2016,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 29, no. 175 , pp. 155–161, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/406062/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button