COMPARING THE SELF ASSESSMENT OF LAST YEAR MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL SKILLS WITH TEACHER ASSESSMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DELARAM M.; SAFDARI DECHESHMEH F.; AKBARI N.; HOSEINI S.; RAFIEI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Hormozgan Medical Journal Year:2013 | Volume:17 | Issue:3 Page(s): 273-281

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

989

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE SELF ASSESSMENT OF LAST YEAR MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL SKILLS WITH TEACHER ASSESSMENT

Author(s)

Keywords

SELF-ASSESSMENTQ2

SKILLSQ3

STUDENTSQ2

SHAHREKORDQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Although evaluation of STUDENTS is always stressed by educational specialists, but one of the accepted methods for evaluation, is self assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare the self and instructors assessment in clinical SKILLS of midwifery STUDENTS who are completing their education in SHAHREKORD university of medical sciences.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, self assessment of 47 last year midwifery STUDENTS for clinical SKILLS in gynecology and obstetrics subjects as an evaluation in final examination, was compared with clinical instructors’ assessment. Descriptive and analytic statistics with SPSS was used for data analysis and P<0.05 was considered significant.Results: Mean and standard deviation of the scores for gynecology subjects evaluation based on total score of 130 for 26 items was 86.42±7.79 for the instructors and 82.46±12.60 for the STUDENTS. This difference was not statistically significant. The same statistics for obstetrics subjects were 136.40±10.57 and 134.19±27.98 out of 190 for 38 items for the instructors and for the STUDENTS, respectively. This difference was also not statistically significant.Conclusion: The results of study showed that STUDENTS are able to judge their performance accurately. Assessing and including the student evaluation can improve the processes of evaluation.

Cites

THE ASSESMENT OF NURSERY AND MIDWIFERY GRADUATE STUDENT SELF EVALUATION

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DELARAM, M., SAFDARI DECHESHMEH, F., AKBARI, N., HOSEINI, S., & RAFIEI, H.. (2013). COMPARING THE SELF ASSESSMENT OF LAST YEAR MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL SKILLS WITH TEACHER ASSESSMENT. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 17(3), 273-281. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/60188/en

Vancouver: Copy

DELARAM M., SAFDARI DECHESHMEH F., AKBARI N., HOSEINI S., RAFIEI H.. COMPARING THE SELF ASSESSMENT OF LAST YEAR MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL SKILLS WITH TEACHER ASSESSMENT. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;17(3):273-281. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/60188/en

IEEE: Copy

M. DELARAM, F. SAFDARI DECHESHMEH, N. AKBARI, S. HOSEINI, and H. RAFIEI, “COMPARING THE SELF ASSESSMENT OF LAST YEAR MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN CLINICAL SKILLS WITH TEACHER ASSESSMENT,” HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/60188/en

Related Journal Papers