مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

902
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ANTEROPOSTERIOR ANALYSES OF CRANIUM AND JAWS OF NORMAL OCCLUSION SAMPLES IN NHP

Pages

  183-192

Abstract

 Introduction: NHP is a position that depends on morphology and figure of every body. The purpose of this study was measuring cephalometric norm in NHP to compare four anteroposterior analyses of Cooke, Wits, Reidel and Sassouni in NHP and determining their consistence with clinical status.Materials and Methods: This study was a cross sectional study and the data collecting method was direct observation and lateral cephalomteric radiography using informational forms. In this study 40 high school student girls with NORMAL OCCLUSION and the age between 16-18 years old with an average of 17.3 years old were selected from different districts of Mashhad through random cluster sampling. From each student one lateral cephalometry (with permission from the parents and students) was taken in NHP position.The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software (Fisher's exact test in two way cross tabulation).Results:1.Cooke, Wits, Reidel and Sassouni showed 85%, 75%, 70% and 32.5% concordance with the clinical status respectively. 2. In comparison between Wits and Reidel analyses, the difference was not significant. P-v>0.05 3. In comparison between Cooke and Wits analyses, the difference was not significant. P-v>0.05 4. In comparison between Wits and Sassouni, the difference was highly significant. P-v<0.01 5. In comparison between Reidel and Sassouni, the difference was highly significant. P-v<0.01 6. In comparison between Cooke and Sassouni, the difference was highly significant. P-v<0.01Conclusion: In this study statistical evaluation justifies more concordance of the ANTEROPOSTERIOR ANALYSIS of Cooke, Wits and Reidel with clinical status but Sassouni analysis can not be considered as a reliable method. In comparing the upper methods from view point of reliability, Cooke seems to be the most reliable analysis followed by wits and Reidel analyses.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ZARINGHALAM, M., & ARSHADI, M.. (2005). COMPARISON OF ANTEROPOSTERIOR ANALYSES OF CRANIUM AND JAWS OF NORMAL OCCLUSION SAMPLES IN NHP. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 28(3-4), 183-192. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/74384/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ZARINGHALAM M., ARSHADI M.. COMPARISON OF ANTEROPOSTERIOR ANALYSES OF CRANIUM AND JAWS OF NORMAL OCCLUSION SAMPLES IN NHP. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2005;28(3-4):183-192. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/74384/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. ZARINGHALAM, and M. ARSHADI, “COMPARISON OF ANTEROPOSTERIOR ANALYSES OF CRANIUM AND JAWS OF NORMAL OCCLUSION SAMPLES IN NHP,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 183–192, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/74384/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top