مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

670
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPRAISION OF UREASE TEST WITH GIEMSA STAINING FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC ULCER AND GASTRITIS

Pages

  67-71

Abstract

 Background and Objective: HELICOBACTER PYLORI are one of the most common gastrointestinal bacterium infections. This study was done to compare the UREASE TEST with GIEMSA STAINING to detection of HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection in patients with GASTRIC ULCER and GASTRITIS.Methods: This descriptive – analytic study was conducted on 601 patients' diagnosed with GASTRIC ULCER and GASTRITIS, whom under went endoscopy in 5th Azar hospital, Gorgan, Iran during 2008-12. Rapid UREASE TEST was immediately taken during endoscopy. Pathological examination, GIEMSA STAINING on paraffin blocks and haematoxylin and eosin stain were done to assess either presence or absence of HELICOBACTER PYLORI.Results: Based on biopsy results, GASTRITIS and GASTRIC ULCER were diagnosed in 80.69% and 19.3%, respectively. In GASTRITIS and GASTRIC ULCER patients, there was a significant differences between UREASE TEST (91.5% and 90%, respectively) in comparison with GIEMSA STAINING (91.5% and 90%, respectively) (P<0.05).Conclusion: The study revealed that in primary diagnosis and screening of role of HELICOBACTER PYLORI in patients with GASTRIC ULCER and GASTRITIS, UREASE TEST is suitable than GIEMSA STAINING.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DAVALOO, R., KABOOSI, H., HEIDARI, KH., AZARHOUSH, R., NAEIMI TABIEI, E., & KAZEMINEJAD, V.. (2017). COMPRAISION OF UREASE TEST WITH GIEMSA STAINING FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC ULCER AND GASTRITIS. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 19(1 (61) ), 67-71. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/79411/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DAVALOO R., KABOOSI H., HEIDARI KH., AZARHOUSH R., NAEIMI TABIEI E., KAZEMINEJAD V.. COMPRAISION OF UREASE TEST WITH GIEMSA STAINING FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC ULCER AND GASTRITIS. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2017;19(1 (61) ):67-71. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/79411/en

    IEEE: Copy

    R. DAVALOO, H. KABOOSI, KH. HEIDARI, R. AZARHOUSH, E. NAEIMI TABIEI, and V. KAZEMINEJAD, “COMPRAISION OF UREASE TEST WITH GIEMSA STAINING FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC ULCER AND GASTRITIS,” JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 19, no. 1 (61) , pp. 67–71, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/79411/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top