RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI MARYAM; MORADI ALIREZA; KORMI NOURI REZA; HASSANI JAFAR; PARHOON HADI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advances in Cognitive Sciences Year:2016 | Volume:18 | Issue:1 Page(s): 22-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,865

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA)

Author(s)

Keywords

READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA)Q1

CRONBACH’S ALPHAQ1

FACTOR ANALYSISQ2

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of reading and dyslexia test (NEMA) Method: A total of 1614 primary school students from Tabriz, Sanandaj and Tehran were evaluated using the reading and dyslexia test (NEMA). The study sample was selected by stratified random-sampling among students from the three cities (Tehran: 600, Sanandaj: 500, Tabriz: 500). A total of 770 male and 844 female 5th-grade students were enrolled from the primary school in Tehran and Sanandaj Tabriz.Results: Findings demonstrated a good internal consistency of vocabulary test with high-frequency, medium-frequency and low-frequency words, word string, words understanding and pseudo-words is the elimination of sounds and reading fake-words. However, calling pictures tests (both forms) with moderate internal consistency and text understanding with poor internal consistency, seem to require revisions to acquire an improved Cronbach, s alpha.Conclusion: The overall CRONBACH’S ALPHA for tests with high-frequency words, words with medium frequency, low-frequency words, word string, test of rhyme, calling pictures 1, 2, text comprehension, words understanding, elimination of sounds, and pseudo-word, reading fake-words were 0.97, 0.98, 0.98, 0.95, 0.89, 0.67, 0.68, 0.48, 0.71, 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. Also, the results of FACTOR ANALYSIS showed that NEMA test includes two major components. The first factor includes vocabulary tests with high-frequency and medium-frequency words, understanding words, elimination of sounds, pseudo-words and reading fake-words. The second factor includes of words, rhymes, calling the pictures of 1, 2, text understanding and signs test.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, MARYAM, MORADI, ALIREZA, KORMI NOURI, REZA, HASSANI, JAFAR, & PARHOON, HADI. (2016). RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA). ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 18(1), 22-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82734/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI MARYAM, MORADI ALIREZA, KORMI NOURI REZA, HASSANI JAFAR, PARHOON HADI. RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA). ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE[Internet]. 2016;18(1):22-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82734/en

IEEE: Copy

MARYAM HOSSEINI, ALIREZA MORADI, REZA KORMI NOURI, JAFAR HASSANI, and HADI PARHOON, “RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF READING AND DYSLEXIA TEST (NEMA),” ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82734/en

Related Journal Papers