Meta-Analysis of the Findings on the Effects of Descriptive Evaluation on Learning Outcomes

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AALI A.; Mobarak Ghamsari r.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF EDUCATION Year:2018 | Volume:34 | Issue:1 (133) Page(s): 139-156

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,056

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Meta-Analysis of the Findings on the Effects of Descriptive Evaluation on Learning Outcomes

Author(s)

AALI A. | Mobarak Ghamsari r. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

descriptive evaluationQ2

learning outcomesQ1

meta-analysisQ2

cognitive/affective/behavioral outcomeQ1

Abstract

Changing the way that students’ learning is evaluated to what is called descriptive evaluation during the past decade has been the focus of many studies with conflicting results. To clarify the picture and determine the true impact of this type of evaluation on cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning, 52 studies were chosen for meta-analysis from among all such studies accessible. Following a sensitivity analysis, 21 asymmetric effect sizes, from among 135 identified, were eliminated and the combined effect size for the remaining 114 in both fixed and randomized models was assessed to be 0. 558 and 0. 505, respectively. The significance of both effect sizes is indicative of moderate effectiveness of descriptive evaluation in all three dimensions of learning, with the cognitive dimension being most affected, while the effect on affective learning is the least. Further analyses of variance showed significant difference between the effect sizes on different learning outcomes.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AALI, A., & Mobarak Ghamsari, r.. (2018). Meta-Analysis of the Findings on the Effects of Descriptive Evaluation on Learning Outcomes. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 34(1 (133) ), 139-156. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/87700/en

Vancouver: Copy

AALI A., Mobarak Ghamsari r.. Meta-Analysis of the Findings on the Effects of Descriptive Evaluation on Learning Outcomes. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION[Internet]. 2018;34(1 (133) ):139-156. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/87700/en

IEEE: Copy

A. AALI, and r. Mobarak Ghamsari, “Meta-Analysis of the Findings on the Effects of Descriptive Evaluation on Learning Outcomes,” JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, vol. 34, no. 1 (133) , pp. 139–156, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/87700/en

Related Journal Papers