STUDENTS’ VIEWPOINTS AND EXPERIENCES ABOUT EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN THEORETICAL COURSES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SANAGOU AKRAM; JOUYBARI L.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2010 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 Page(s): 57-69

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,149

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STUDENTS’ VIEWPOINTS AND EXPERIENCES ABOUT EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN THEORETICAL COURSES

Author(s)

SANAGOU AKRAM | JOUYBARI L. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONQ3

ACADEMIC STAFFQ3

STUDENTQ3

CONTENT ANALYSISQ2

Abstract

Background & Objective: EVALUATION of ACADEMIC STAFF is conducted in different ways. One of these methods which are commonly applied nowadays is asking STUDENTs (the only group that experience the direct effect of teaching during the course) about their opinions. Hence, this study was conducted to present the STUDENTs’ viewpoints about the EVALUATION of ACADEMIC STAFF’s performance using EVALUATION forms.Methods: In this qualitative, using phenomenology, 40 STUDENTs of nursing, midwifery, medicine, and allied health sciences from different semesters were participated in individual semi-structured interviews and group discussions in order to understand their viewpoints and experiences about EVALUATION of ACADEMIC STAFF in theoretical courses. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data was analyzed using the "content analysis" method.Results: Our findings suggest that although the STUDENTs are in agreement with evaluating the ACADEMIC STAFF, they are reluctant to fill in the forms and stated that the current situation is not satisfactory. "Change, relativity, a STUDENT as a judge, non-effective time, open doors, effective question, and non-effective question" represent STUDENTs’ viewpoints and experiences about evaluating ACADEMIC STAFF in theoretical courses using EVALUATION forms. The participants emphasized the EVALUATION should be used as a positive reinforcement for improving education quality.Conclusion: ACADEMIC STAFF is the main elements in STUDENTs’ learning and could act inhibitors and facilitators. By teaching EVALUATION, one can make changes or corrections in further programs. Meanwhile, creative interventions are essential to satisfy STUDENTs.

Cites

HOWNESS OF TEACHER'S INTERACTION IN THE CLINICAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF THE MEDICAL STUDENTS

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SANAGOU, AKRAM, & JOUYBARI, L.. (2010). STUDENTS’ VIEWPOINTS AND EXPERIENCES ABOUT EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN THEORETICAL COURSES. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 7(1), 57-69. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116765/en

Vancouver: Copy

SANAGOU AKRAM, JOUYBARI L.. STUDENTS’ VIEWPOINTS AND EXPERIENCES ABOUT EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN THEORETICAL COURSES. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2010;7(1):57-69. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116765/en

IEEE: Copy

AKRAM SANAGOU, and L. JOUYBARI, “STUDENTS’ VIEWPOINTS AND EXPERIENCES ABOUT EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN THEORETICAL COURSES,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116765/en

Related Journal Papers