FACULTY EVALUATION BY STUDENTS: A REVIEW OF CRITICISMS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DEHGHANI MASOUD; NAKHAEE NOUZAR

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2012 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 102-109

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

2,400

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FACULTY EVALUATION BY STUDENTS: A REVIEW OF CRITICISMS

Author(s)

DEHGHANI MASOUD | NAKHAEE NOUZAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TEACHINGQ2

PROGRAM EVALUATIONQ2

FACULTYQ3

IRANQ2

Abstract

Background & Objective: The aim of FACULTY evaluation is to improve TEACHING quality. One of the most common methods of FACULTY evaluation is student evaluation of TEACHING (SET). The original purpose of SET was to provide feedback that can be used by faculties to improve their TEACHING (formative evaluation). In time, this function was replaced by summative evaluation (for administrative purposes). Using the SET results to guide improvements in the TEACHING process is viewed generally as an acceptable practice, but utilization of the SET results for administrative purposes is a matter of hot debate. Regarding the pivotal role of the SET results in promotion of an individual FACULTY this narrative review was carried out to gain an overview of critiques that have been voiced on SET. In-country studies reveal that a high percentage of faculties have criticisms towards SET so that its validity becomes questionable. According to some international studies not only the SET is an invalid measure for assessing TEACHING effectiveness but also it may lead to decrement in TEACHING quality. Nationwide studies enrolling a representative sample of Medical Universities are warranted to reply to the question that “Does administrative use of the SET results lead to improvement in TEACHING quality?”

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DEHGHANI, MASOUD, & NAKHAEE, NOUZAR. (2012). FACULTY EVALUATION BY STUDENTS: A REVIEW OF CRITICISMS. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 9(2), 102-109. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116905/en

Vancouver: Copy

DEHGHANI MASOUD, NAKHAEE NOUZAR. FACULTY EVALUATION BY STUDENTS: A REVIEW OF CRITICISMS. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2012;9(2):102-109. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116905/en

IEEE: Copy

MASOUD DEHGHANI, and NOUZAR NAKHAEE, “FACULTY EVALUATION BY STUDENTS: A REVIEW OF CRITICISMS,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–109, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116905/en

Related Journal Papers