THE VIEWPOINTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS ON EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BABAEI T.; SHEIKHZADEH M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Nursing And Midwifery Journal Year:2015 | Volume:13 | Issue:9 (74) Page(s): 772-780

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

685

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE VIEWPOINTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS ON EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Author(s)

BABAEI T. | SHEIKHZADEH M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FACULTYQ2

PARTICIPATIONQ3

GOAL FREEQ2

RESULTSQ2

MODELQ1

Abstract

Background & Aims: Higher education system is a great asset and Playsdifferent rolesinsocieties. Ensuring from the acquisition of knowledge, skills and competencies required by the graduates and the need for evaluation as a management practice are prerequisite for this system. The present study aimed to assess the common methods of educational evaluation from the view of FACULTY members was conducted.Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study in 2013, 167 members of the FACULTY of Urmia Medical Sciences were selected. Data collected by a Researcher made questionnaire. Friedman test, t-test and ANOVA were used for data analysis.Results: Of 165 respondents, 27 Ph.D. were and 108 were PhD degrees. From the view of FACULTY members, participatory and goal-free MODELs were more favorable. Analysis of the RESULTS revealed preference MODELs on the basis of teaching experience gender and having a managerial position were not significant. ANOVA and LSD tests showed that in the goal-oriented MODEL, difference of mean scores between the ranks of associate professor and assistant professor (P=0.003) and in the management-oriented MODEL difference of mean scores between the ranks of lecturer and assistant professor (P=0.04) were significant.Conclusion: Preferences of FACULTY members indicated that considering only the defined goals objectives and neglecting unforeseen and actual RESULTS on the one hand and PARTICIPATION of stakeholders, particularly students, were important criteria in the selection. Considering all RESULTS, and interaction with all stakeholders in evaluation, will strengthen its credibility and effectiveness.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BABAEI, T., & SHEIKHZADEH, M.. (2015). THE VIEWPOINTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS ON EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY, 13(9 (74)), 772-780. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191175/en

Vancouver: Copy

BABAEI T., SHEIKHZADEH M.. THE VIEWPOINTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS ON EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY[Internet]. 2015;13(9 (74)):772-780. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191175/en

IEEE: Copy

T. BABAEI, and M. SHEIKHZADEH, “THE VIEWPOINTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS ON EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” JOURNAL OF URMIA NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FACULTY, vol. 13, no. 9 (74), pp. 772–780, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191175/en

Related Journal Papers