VIEWPOINT OF FACULTY MEMBERS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2014

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHEIKHZADEH M.; NABILOU B.; BABAEI SH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

804

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

VIEWPOINT OF FACULTY MEMBERS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2014

Author(s)

SHEIKHZADEH M. | NABILOU B. | BABAEI SH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ASSESSMENTQ2

EDUCATIONQ2

FACULTYQ1

EVALUATIONQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Higher EDUCATION system is a great asset and play different roles in societies. Ensuring of acquisition of knowledge, skills and competencies were required by the graduates and the need for EVALUATION as a management practice are prerequisite for this system. The present study aimed to assess the common methods of EDUCATIONal EVALUATION from the views of FACULTY members in Urmia University of medical sciences.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 167 members of the FACULTY of Urmia Medical Sciences were selected in 2013. Data were collected by a Researcher made questionnaire. Friedman test, t-test and ANOVA were used for data analysis.Results: Of 165 respondents, 27 were PhD and 108 were medical specialists. From the view of FACULTY members, participatory and goal-free models were more favorable. Analysis of the results revealed preference models on the basis of teaching experience; gender and having managerial position were not significant. ANOVA and LSD tests showed that in the goal-oriented model, difference of mean scores between the ranks of associate professor (3.77) and assistant professor (4.12), (P=0.003) and in the management-oriented model difference of mean scores between the ranks of lecturer (4.66) and assistant professor (4.38), were significant (P=0.04).Conclusion: Viewpoint and preferences of FACULTY members indicated that not only the defined goals objectives and results but also unforseen actual results, participation of stakeholders, particularly students, who were important in the selection of EVALUATION models must be considered, so that it will strengthen their credibility and effectiveness.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHEIKHZADEH, M., NABILOU, B., & BABAEI, SH.. (2015). VIEWPOINT OF FACULTY MEMBERS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2014. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 7(3), 21-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244538/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHEIKHZADEH M., NABILOU B., BABAEI SH.. VIEWPOINT OF FACULTY MEMBERS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2014. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2015;7(3):21-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244538/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SHEIKHZADEH, B. NABILOU, and SH. BABAEI, “VIEWPOINT OF FACULTY MEMBERS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION MODELS IN URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2014,” RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 21–29, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244538/en

Related Journal Papers