THE SITUATION OF FACULTY EVALUATION OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2000

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

IRANFAR SH.; NASERANIPOOR M.; RAHIMI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Year:2001 | Volume:4 | Issue:3 Page(s): 27-32

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

945

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE SITUATION OF FACULTY EVALUATION OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2000

Author(s)

IRANFAR SH. | NASERANIPOOR M. | RAHIMI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TEACHING ACTIVITIESQ3

FACULTY EVALUATIONQ3

STUDENT POINT OF VIEWQ4

Abstract

The most important section of FACULTY EVALUATION is their feedback for improvement in teaching activity. The purpose of this survey is to determine the situation of the teachers' TEACHING ACTIVITIES at KUMS in 2000.A Collection of old data was used. The Sampling was consensus and all the questionnaire completed by students, were collected and analyzed. The questionnaires contained variables on punctuality observing the class time frame, considering the students regular class attendance, quality of tests, using instructional technology, encouraging students to research and study, scientific capability, how to answer students' questions and student sharing in class. The evaluation form was designed by Educational development centre, the scales of variables were "excellent", "good", "medium" and "poor". The analysis of data was achieved by spearman test. The students completed 4368 questionnaires about 107 teachers' activities. The findings showed that 50.1% of students had evaluated their teacher's activities "excellent", 29.8%. "good", 18.6% "medium" and 1.5% "poor". The male students evaluated their teachers' activities better than female students (70% vs 64.5%), expected mark and course degree showed significant correlation with FACULTY EVALUATION (P<0.001).High percentage of students evaluated the teachers activities "excellent", but the variables: "using of educational technology" and expression of objectives" were evaluated "poor". Research is recommended to determine the effect of the students' knowledge about teaching skills on evaluation.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

IRANFAR, SH., NASERANIPOOR, M., & RAHIMI, M.. (2001). THE SITUATION OF FACULTY EVALUATION OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2000. JOURNAL OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (BEHBOOD), 4(3), 27-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/20726/en

Vancouver: Copy

IRANFAR SH., NASERANIPOOR M., RAHIMI M.. THE SITUATION OF FACULTY EVALUATION OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2000. JOURNAL OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (BEHBOOD)[Internet]. 2001;4(3):27-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/20726/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. IRANFAR, M. NASERANIPOOR, and M. RAHIMI, “THE SITUATION OF FACULTY EVALUATION OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2000,” JOURNAL OF KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (BEHBOOD), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 27–32, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/20726/en

Related Journal Papers